Two-Stage Membrane Separation for Low-Concentration CO2 Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrated coal gasification combined cycle power generation faces challenges in efficiently separating CO2 from mixed gases with low CO2 concentrations, as existing separation membranes lack sufficient selectivity and increase construction and operation costs.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a two-stage membrane separation process using a first separation membrane with high H2/CO2 selectivity and a second membrane with high CO2/H2 selectivity, followed by chemical absorption in a CO2 collector to enhance CO2 recovery rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If chemical absorption using an amine absorbent is adopted to collect CO2, then CO2 collection efficiency is improved, but construction and operation costs increase and facility size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 collection efficiencyVSAvoidfacility size and construction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/chemical absorption system (amine absorbent) with a membrane-based separation system that utilizes selective permeability properties. The membrane module separates CO2 from the mixed gas through physical membrane separation, eliminating the need for large-scale chemical absorption facilities and reducing both construction costs and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a membrane with specific porous structure and selective permeability to separate CO2 from the mixed gas. The membrane material allows CO2 to pass through selectively while retaining other gases, enabling efficient CO2 collection without requiring large chemical absorption facilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Device complexity

If air-blown gasification is used to eliminate oxygen extraction plant, then construction and operation costs are reduced, but CO2 concentration in produced gas becomes low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction and operation costVSAvoidCO2 concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional CO2 separation methods with membrane-based separation that is specifically effective for low-concentration CO2 streams. The membrane module achieves high CO2 recovery rates even when CO2 concentration in the feed gas is low, as is the case with air-blown gasification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the selective permeability parameters of the membrane material to achieve separation based on gas composition differences. By optimizing membrane selection and operational parameters, the system achieves effective CO2 separation from low-concentration mixed gases produced by air-blown gasification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If high-selectivity separation membranes are used to separate CO2 from low-concentration mixed gas, then CO2 separation efficiency is improved, but membrane cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 separation efficiencyVSAvoidmembrane selectivity requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the CO2 separation process into multiple stages using multiple membrane modules arranged in series. Rather than requiring a single high-selectivity membrane, the system uses multiple membranes with moderate selectivity working together, which reduces individual membrane cost and complexity while achieving high overall separation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from considering only membrane selectivity as the separation parameter to utilizing multi-stage configuration and gas recirculation as additional dimensions of separation enhancement. This multi-dimensional approach allows the use of less expensive membranes with lower individual selectivity while achieving the required overall separation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If hydrogen separation membrane is used to separate H2 from mixed gas, then H2 recovery is improved, but CO2 permeability is inhibited and off-gas requires explosion-proof construction

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveH2 recovery rateVSAvoidexplosion risk in off-gas
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the gas separation process into distinct stages: first separating H2 using a hydrogen separation membrane, then separating CO2 from the off-gas using a CO2 separation membrane. This segmentation prevents CO2 from inhibiting H2 separation and eliminates explosion risks by removing H2 before CO2 collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts H2 from the mixed gas in a first separation stage using a hydrogen-selective membrane, removing the explosive component before the gas proceeds to CO2 separation. This extraction of H2 eliminates the explosion risk in subsequent CO2 collection facilities while maintaining high H2 recovery rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach efficiently separates CO2 from mixed gases with low CO2 concentrations, reducing the need for high-selectivity membranes and simplifying the CO2 collector structure, while achieving high CO2 recovery rates and lowering operational costs.

Implementation Method 1

supplying a mixed gas containing at least N2, H2, and CO2 and having a CO2 concentration of 30% or less by volume to a first separation membrane that selectively allows passage of H2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective permeation: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 2

supplying the first non-permeated gas to a second separation membrane that selectively allows passage of CO2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective permeation: Semipermeable Membrane

Implementation Method 3

supplying the second non-permeated gas to a CO2 collector that separates and collects CO2 by a separation method other than membrane separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical absorption: Chemisorption

Data Source

PatentUS20230330594A1Mixed gas separation method and mixed gas separation device
Publication Date: 2023.10.19 NGK INSULATORS LTD
  • US20230330594A1 patent drawing
  • US20230330594A1 patent drawing
  • US20230330594A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A mixed gas separation method includes supplying a mixed gas containing at least N2, H2, and CO2 and having a CO2 concentration of 30% or less by volume to a first separation membrane that selectively allows passage of H2, supplying the first non-permeated gas to a second separation membrane that selectively allows passage of CO2, and supplying the second non-permeated gas to a CO2 collector that separates and collects CO2 by a separation method other than membrane separation to collect CO2 contained in the second non-permeated gas. The first non-permeated gas has a CO2 concentration that is 5% or more by volume higher than or equal to the CO2 concentration in the mixed gas. The second non-permeated gas has an N2 concentration of 50% or more by volume and an H2 concentration of 30% or less by volume.