Membrane Puncturing Mechanism with On-Demand Spring Loading

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inflation valve mechanisms that rely on preloaded springs to puncture membranes can lose restoring force over time, potentially failing to inflate systems due to spring relaxation, requiring frequent replacements and increasing servicing burdens, especially in safety-critical applications.

Innovation Solution

A membrane puncturing mechanism featuring a first and second element with opposing surfaces, a pin for puncturing, and an actuator that loads the spring by moving the elements apart, allowing the pin to puncture the membrane under the spring's restoring force, with a locking mechanism to prevent accidental actuation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If fully preloaded springs are used to accelerate the needle into the membrane, then the membrane puncturing mechanism can achieve rapid inflation, but the restoring force reduces over time due to spring relaxation, leading to potential failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinflation speedVSAvoidpuncturing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is designed to be dynamically loaded during operation rather than permanently preloaded. The spring remains uncompressed during storage and transport, then is compressed by the actuator just before use. This dynamic loading approach eliminates long-term relaxation while maintaining the ability to deliver high acceleration forces for rapid inflation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator performs a preliminary action of compressing the spring immediately before membrane puncture is required. This preliminary compression loads the spring to the necessary force level right before use, ensuring maximum restoring force is available when needed without the degradation associated with prolonged preloading.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If larger and heavier springs are used to lessen spring relaxation, then spring relaxation is reduced, but the mechanism becomes bulkier and heavier

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring force consistencyVSAvoidmechanism weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By transitioning from a statically preloaded spring to a dynamically loaded spring, the system eliminates the need for oversized springs that would be required to compensate for relaxation. The spring operates within its optimal force range throughout its service life, maintaining consistent performance without increasing mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Force

If fully preloaded springs are used in the mechanism, then the mechanism can puncture the membrane effectively, but the spring needs periodic replacement due to relaxation, increasing servicing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneedle acceleration forceVSAvoidspring replacement frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The spring is compressed only when needed by the actuator mechanism, rather than being permanently preloaded. This dynamic operation prevents the gradual relaxation that occurs with continuous preloading, allowing the spring to maintain its force characteristics over extended periods and reducing replacement frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring effectively services itself by being reloaded on-demand by the actuator mechanism. Each use resets the spring to its full force capability, eliminating the cumulative degradation seen in preloaded systems and extending the service interval before replacement is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism maintains consistent puncturing force over time, reducing the need for frequent spring replacements and minimizing bulk and weight, while ensuring reliable operation in safety-critical systems.

Implementation Method 1

A spring is operable to bias the first element towards the second element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the actuator being fully withdrawn from between the opposing surfaces allows the first element to move towards the second element under the load of the spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11274754B2Membrane puncturing mechanism
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 GOODRICH CORP
  • US11274754B2 patent drawing
  • US11274754B2 patent drawing
  • US11274754B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A membrane puncturing mechanism comprises a first element and a second element arranged with opposing surfaces. At least one opposing surface comprises a sloping region inclined relative to the other opposing surface. The first element is moveable towards and away from the second element. A pin for puncturing a membrane is coupled to the first element such that movement of one of the pin and first element causes movement of both. A spring is operable to bias the first element towards the second element. An actuator is removably positioned between the opposing surfaces, the actuator being withdrawable from between and moveable along the opposing surfaces such that, as the actuator is withdrawn, the actuator progressively moves the first and second elements apart against the bias of the spring so as to load the spring and such that the actuator being fully withdrawn from between the opposing surfaces.