Memory Access Deciding Component for Block Size Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining whether to use cache or direct storage in computing systems are inefficient as they do not account for varying block sizes and system performance, leading to suboptimal access speeds and increased processor load.

Innovation Solution

A deciding component that measures and calculates the efficiency of using cache or direct storage based on block sizes and system parameters, such as time and processor resources, to dynamically determine the most efficient memory type for reading and writing operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If cache is used for all data streams, then access speed is improved, but processor overhead increases and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess speedVSAvoidprocessor overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of data block size to determine the optimal storage path. By measuring actual read/write times for different block sizes and comparing cache versus direct storage performance, the system dynamically selects the most efficient path based on measured parameters rather than using a fixed cache-for-all approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the data access strategy based on real-time measurements. It continuously measures read and write times for different block sizes and automatically selects between cache and direct storage based on current performance characteristics, making the system adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If direct storage access is used, then processor overhead is reduced, but access speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor overheadVSAvoidaccess speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses block size as a changing parameter to select between direct storage and cache access. For certain block sizes where direct storage proves faster through measurement, the system routes data directly to storage, eliminating unnecessary cache overhead while maintaining optimal speed for those specific cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-measurement and self-optimization by automatically timing read/write operations and selecting the fastest path without external intervention. The deciding component autonomously measures performance and adjusts access patterns based on empirical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If cache is used for small data blocks, then access speed is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses block size as a critical parameter to determine energy-efficient access paths. By measuring actual performance for different block sizes, the system identifies that small blocks may benefit from cache while larger blocks are more efficient through direct storage, optimizing the energy-speed tradeoff based on measured parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using cache for all data regardless of size, the system applies cache selectively only when measurements show it provides net benefit. For data blocks where direct storage is equally or more efficient, the system skips the cache step, avoiding unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining adequate performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of manufacture

If fixed cache policy is used, then implementation is simple, but system efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurements of read and write times for different block sizes before making access decisions. By pre-measuring and storing performance characteristics for various block sizes, the system creates a lookup reference that guides subsequent access decisions, combining simple policy-based selection with empirically optimized parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously measures actual access times and uses this feedback to refine its decisions. The deciding component collects performance data, compares measured times against thresholds, and adjusts its routing policy based on real-world performance feedback, creating a closed-loop optimization system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2588964B1Reading or writing to memory
Publication Date: 2019.12.25 TUXERA
  • EP2588964B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2588964B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

To increase the efficiency of a running application, it is determined whether using a cache(140)or directly a storage(150)is more efficient block size -specifically(131); and the determined memory type is used for a data stream having a corresponding block size.