Memory Device Anomaly Detection via Supervisory Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining memory device performance are inadequate for real-time monitoring and identifying potential malfunctions, particularly in predicting anomalies that could lead to data corruption or loss, as they fail to accurately assess the physical state of memory devices.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a supervisory entity computer to monitor I/O operations, apply a pre-determined model to estimate benchmark processing times, and generate performance parameters to detect potential anomalies in memory devices, such as SSDs, by analyzing actual activity times and benchmark processing times, allowing for early flagging of issues to system administrators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If prior art methods (SMART technology) are used to detect drive reliability indicators, then hardware failures can be anticipated, but real-time monitoring of actual performance degradation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrive reliabilityVSAvoidperformance degradation detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical monitoring methods (SMART technology that checks physical indicators) with a computational model-based approach. A supervisory entity computer uses a disk-drive model to simulate and compare expected versus actual performance, enabling precise detection of performance degradation through virtual modeling rather than physical measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a supervisory entity computer as an intermediary between the memory device and the monitoring system. This intermediary collects performance data, applies predictive models, and generates alerts, serving as a mediator that bridges the gap between raw hardware operation and meaningful reliability assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional monitoring methods are used, then general hardware failures can be detected, but specific real-time performance anomalies leading to data corruption cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidperformance anomaly detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by establishing a disk-drive model that simulates expected performance characteristics before actual failures occur. The supervisory entity continuously compares real-time performance against this pre-established model, enabling early detection of anomalies that could lead to data corruption before they manifest as complete failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the supervisory entity computer continuously monitors performance data, compares it against the disk-drive model predictions, and generates alerts when deviations exceed thresholds. This closed-loop feedback system enables real-time detection and response to performance anomalies that threaten data integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If performance monitoring is implemented, then potential malfunctions can be detected, but the system complexity increases due to additional monitoring infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory device reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The supervisory entity computer serves multiple functions: it acts as a performance monitor, a predictive model engine, an alert generator, and a historical data analyzer. By consolidating these functions into a single multi-functional system rather than separate specialized components, the patent reduces overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11449376B2Method of determining potential anomaly of memory device
Publication Date: 2022.09.20 Y E HUB ARMENIA LLC
  • US11449376B2 patent drawing
  • US11449376B2 patent drawing
  • US11449376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of determining a potential anomaly of a memory device is executable at a supervisory entity computer communicatively coupled to the memory device. The method includes, over a pre-determined period of time, determining a subset of input/output (I/O) operations having been sent to the memory device for processing, applying at least one counter to determine an actual activity time of the memory device during the pre-determined period of time, applying a pre-determined model to generate an estimate of a benchmark processing time for each one of the subset of transactions, calculating a benchmark processing time for the subset of I/O operations, generating a performance parameter based on the actual activity time and the benchmark processing time, and based on an analysis of the performance parameter, determining if the potential anomaly is present in the memory device.