Memory Cell With Independently-Sized Electrodes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current memory device fabrication challenges include reducing device size, increasing storage density, reducing power consumption, and lowering costs, particularly in the context of non-volatile memory technologies like phase change material (PCM) memory, where achieving high current density and preventing stringer defects during etching are critical.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a memory cell architecture with a middle electrode having independent dimensions from the outside electrodes, allowing for reduced lateral dimensions of the middle electrode to enhance current density and prevent stringer formation during etching, achieved through advanced dry etching techniques and material selection, such as using carbon-based electrodes with nitrogen for increased etch rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the lateral dimension of the middle electrode is reduced to increase current density, then the effectiveness of inducing phase transitions is improved, but the risk of stringer defects during etching increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent densityVSAvoidstringer defect risk
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by making the middle electrode have different lateral dimensions than the outside electrodes. Specifically, the middle electrode's lateral dimension is reduced to increase current density and improve phase transition effectiveness, while the outside electrodes maintain larger dimensions to prevent stringer defects during etching. This localized differentiation allows each electrode to be optimized for its specific function without compromising overall device reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If the lateral dimension of the middle electrode is reduced to improve phase transition effectiveness, then memory device performance is improved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase transition effectivenessVSAvoidetching precision
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different lateral dimensions to different electrodes. The middle electrode is designed with reduced lateral dimensions to achieve the necessary current density for effective phase transitions, while outside electrodes maintain larger dimensions that are more tolerant to manufacturing variations. This differentiated design allows precise control where needed while maintaining robustness in other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by forming the middle electrode with its reduced lateral dimension before the final etching processes. This allows the middle electrode to be precisely defined early in the fabrication sequence, enabling subsequent processes to work around it without compromising the critical dimensions needed for high current density and effective phase transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If independent electrode dimensions are implemented, then device functionality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the electrode structure into distinct components with independent dimensions. The middle electrode is segmented from the outside electrodes, allowing each to be optimized independently for its specific function. This segmentation enables the middle electrode to have reduced lateral dimensions for high current density while outside electrodes maintain larger dimensions for reliability, achieving improved device functionality through structured division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases the effectiveness of inducing phase transitions in memory elements while reducing the risk of stringer defects, thereby improving memory device performance and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

Reducing lateral dimension(s) of the middle electrode can increase the current density at the middle electrode/memory element contact surface area for a given amount of input power, thereby improving the effectiveness to induce memory element phase transitions due to thermal budget on the memory element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10777743B2Memory cell with independently-sized electrode
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US10777743B2 patent drawing
  • US10777743B2 patent drawing
  • US10777743B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Memory cell architectures and methods of forming the same are provided. An example memory cell can include a switch element and a memory element. A middle electrode is formed between the memory element and the switch element. An outside electrode is formed adjacent the switch element or the memory element at a location other than between the memory element and the switch element. A lateral dimension of the middle electrode is different than a lateral dimension of the outside electrode.