Memory Controller Clock Tuning for Workload Bottlenecks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing memory devices lack adaptive tuning of clock rates, leading to inefficient power consumption and performance issues due to fixed clock rates that do not account for varying system environments and workload bottlenecks.

Innovation Solution

Implement a controller that predicts workload bottlenecks and adjusts clock rates accordingly by maintaining a clock rate table, identifying and maximizing the clock rate of bottleneck components while reducing non-bottleneck components to optimize power consumption and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed clock rates are used for all components, then device complexity is reduced and ease of operation is improved, but power consumption efficiency deteriorates and performance suffers due to inability to adapt to varying workloads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptive tuning of clock ratesVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller pre-determines bottleneck elements for different workload types (sequential read, random read, sequential write, random write) and stores this information in a lookup table. When a workload is identified, the corresponding bottleneck information is retrieved and used to adjust clock rates, eliminating the need for real-time complex analysis during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A workload identification module serves as an intermediary between the system workload and the clock rate adjustment mechanism. This module classifies the current workload type and uses the classification to select appropriate clock rate configurations, decoupling the complexity of bottleneck analysis from the real-time control loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If clock rates are reduced for non-bottleneck elements, then power consumption is reduced, but performance may suffer if bottleneck identification is inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidperformance reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational parameters (clock rates) of different components based on the identified workload type and its associated bottleneck element. By systematically varying clock rates according to pre-determined bottleneck patterns for each workload type, the system achieves power savings while maintaining performance reliability through accurate parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If maximum clock rates are used for all components, then performance is maximized, but power consumption increases unnecessarily during operations where the bottleneck is elsewhere

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different clock rate qualities to different components based on their role in the current workload. Only the bottleneck element operates at maximum clock rate to maintain performance, while non-bottleneck elements operate at reduced clock rates to save power, creating a localized optimization strategy that addresses performance only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If adaptive bottleneck prediction is implemented, then power efficiency and performance are improved, but device complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload adaptation capabilityVSAvoidcontroller structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller pre-determines bottleneck elements for different workload types (sequential read, random read, sequential write, random write) and stores this information in a lookup table. When a workload is identified, the corresponding bottleneck information is retrieved and used to adjust clock rates, eliminating the need for real-time complex analysis during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A workload identification module serves as an intermediary between the system workload and the clock rate adjustment mechanism. This module classifies the current workload type and uses the classification to select appropriate clock rate configurations, decoupling the complexity of bottleneck analysis from the real-time control loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12510922B2Adaptive tuning of memory device clock rates based on usage workloads
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US12510922B2 patent drawing
  • US12510922B2 patent drawing
  • US12510922B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Different operations have different clock rate bottleneck points. For example, during a read operation, the processors may be the bottleneck whereas other operations will not be bottlenecks. Those other operations can have their clock rates reduced to save power since there is no benefit to a higher clock rate as the bottleneck is elsewhere. Predicting the bottleneck would be beneficial. Statistics correlating the bottleneck points with the workload and clock rates are tracked. When the workload changes, the statistics can be consulted to determine where the bottleneck is located and then slow down the clock rates for the non-bottleneck operations. A clock rate table is maintained in the device controller. The table holds the clock rate of each component. Predicting the workload and hence, the clock rates, reduces power consumption, improves performance, and better quality of service (QOS) compatibility characteristics.