Memory Device Command Indicator for Component-Level Performance Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional memory systems lack the ability to specifically identify where performance issues occur during command execution, making it difficult for host systems or testing devices to effectively tune performance.

Innovation Solution

A memory system configured to receive commands with indicators that instruct it to suppress specific operations, allowing the system to generate responses indicating command completion despite incomplete execution. This enables the host system or testing device to discern performance issues at different components of the memory system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional memory systems execute commands completely, then data is read/written accurately, but performance issues cannot be identified at specific components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance issue identification precisionVSAvoidcommand execution control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The command execution process is segmented into multiple operations that can be independently suppressed. The indicator field divides control into: suppress interface operations, suppress processor operations, suppress storage controller operations, or suppress all operations. This segmentation allows precise identification of performance issues at specific components without requiring complex diagnostic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary indicator field is introduced within the command structure to control the execution suppression behavior. This intermediary mechanism enables the host system to selectively suppress operations at different levels (interface, processor, storage controller) and receives standardized responses that identify where performance issues occur, simplifying the overall diagnostic complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the memory system suppresses operations to enable performance tuning, then performance issues can be identified, but complete command execution is prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance tuning efficiencyVSAvoidcommand execution completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial action by suppressing only the necessary operations for performance testing while maintaining the ability to execute complete commands for normal operation. The indicator field allows selective suppression of specific operation stages (interface, processor, storage controller) rather than requiring complete command execution, enabling performance tuning without compromising data integrity during normal use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

A feedback mechanism is provided through standardized responses that indicate command completion status and identify where performance issues occur. The response includes information about which operations were suppressed and whether the command completed successfully, allowing the host system to interpret performance data while maintaining reliable command execution for normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If all operations are suppressed for testing, then performance issues at any component can be identified, but no useful data is read or written

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent-level performance measurementVSAvoiddata read/write capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The operation suppression is segmented by component level (interface, processor, storage controller), allowing selective testing of specific components while maintaining data read/write capability at other levels. This enables performance measurement at any component without completely disabling data operations, as only the tested component's operations are suppressed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality of operation execution is applied locally to different components based on the indicator field value. When testing a specific component, only that component's operations are suppressed while other components remain fully functional for data operations. This local quality differentiation enables performance measurement without losing overall data read/write capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250117163A1Performance tuning for a memory device
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250117163A1 patent drawing
  • US20250117163A1 patent drawing
  • US20250117163A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for performance tuning for a memory device are described. In some examples, a memory system may receive a command (e.g., a read command or a write command) that includes an indicator. The indicator may instruct the memory system to suppress one or more portions of the command. For example, the command may be received by an interface of the memory system and the controller may instruct the memory system to suppress one or more operations performed by a processor of the memory system, a storage controller of the memory system, or both. Upon suppressing one or more operations associated with the command, the memory system may output a response to the test system, which may allow for the test system to tune one or more performance aspects of the memory system.