Memory Controller Turbo-Decoding for Chipkill Bitline Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chipkill recovery schemes in memory systems, particularly in NAND flash memory, struggle with bitline failures due to the difficulty in recovering data when multiple memory chips fail, leading to increased data loss and reduced reliability.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a memory system with a memory controller that utilizes a chipkill parity scheme, involving turbo-decoding and feedback loops with adders to scale soft decode information, and using at least two decoders to enhance error correction capabilities, particularly for bitline errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional chipkill recovery schemes are used, then data loss occurs during bitline failures, but implementing turbo-decoding with feedback loops and multiple decoders increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror correction capabilityVSAvoiddecoder structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decoding process is segmented into multiple decoders (first decoder, second decoder, third decoder) that operate in a feedback loop. Each decoder handles specific aspects of the decoding process, dividing the complex error correction task into manageable segments that can be processed iteratively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A feedback loop is implemented where the output of each decoder is fed back as input to subsequent decoders. The soft decode information from the first decoder is scaled and provided to the second decoder, which in turn provides information to the third decoder, creating an iterative feedback mechanism that progressively refines the error correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 3:

Scaling of soft decode information is performed as a preliminary action before subsequent decoding operations. The adders prior to each decoder scale the soft decode information from previous decoders, preparing optimized input data for the next decoding stage, which improves the overall effectiveness of the error correction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If turbo-decoding with scaling is implemented, then data recovery from bitline failures improves, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata recovery capabilityVSAvoiddecoder implementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The decoder structure is designed to be multi-functional, handling both initial decoding and iterative refinement in a unified architecture. The same decoder components are reused across multiple stages with different input configurations, reducing the need for entirely separate manufacturing processes for each decoding function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The decoding architecture implements a nested structure where multiple decoders are arranged in a hierarchical feedback loop. The first decoder is nested within the overall system, which contains the second decoder, which in turn contains the third decoder, creating a nested arrangement that optimizes space and component utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If multiple decoders in feedback loop are used, then error correction performance increases, but system resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebitline error correctionVSAvoiddecoding process energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback loop mechanism allows for partial action where decoding can be stopped after a predetermined number of iterations if convergence is achieved. This prevents excessive energy consumption by avoiding unnecessary additional decoding cycles once the error correction has reached sufficient accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The decoding process operates in periodic cycles through the feedback loop, with each cycle consisting of sequential processing through the multiple decoders. This periodic structure allows for efficient resource management by organizing energy-intensive operations into regular, controllable intervals rather than continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12360681B2Data recovery with enhanced super chip-kill recovery and method of operating such memory system
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 SK HYNIX INC
  • US12360681B2 patent drawing
  • US12360681B2 patent drawing
  • US12360681B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A memory system having a memory block and a memory controller in communication with the memory block. The memory controller is configured to: decode codewords in the memory block; determine failed codewords based on one or more parity checks including a chipkill parity; and turbo-decode the failed codewords using at least two decoders in a feedback loop with adders prior to each decoder for scaling soft decode information prior to subsequent decoding of the failed codewords.