Memory Die Retention Rating from Regular Scan Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining data retention capability of memory devices require complex firmware implementations and reduce available storage space, leading to increased latency and decreased Quality of Service (QoS) due to the need for stress-inducing operations.

Innovation Solution

Utilize data state metrics obtained from regular scans to rate data retention capability, eliminating the need for separate stress-inducing operations by mapping these metrics to corresponding scan frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If stress-inducing operations are performed to determine data retention capability, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and loss of time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retention capability measurementVSAvoidfirmware implementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the data retention assessment from complex stress-inducing operations and separates it into regular scan operations. By taking out the essential measurement function from the stressful test environment, the system uses normal operational scans to gather data retention information without requiring complex firmware implementations or dedicated stress test infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs data retention assessment during regular scan operations before actual data loss occurs. By continuously monitoring data state metrics during normal operation and mapping them to scan frequencies, the system proactively identifies retention issues before they manifest as failures, eliminating the need for complex post-failure analysis or stress-induced testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If stress-inducing operations are performed to determine data retention capability, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retention capability measurementVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges data retention assessment with regular scan operations. Instead of performing separate stress-inducing operations that would increase latency, the system combines retention monitoring with existing scan workflows, allowing both functions to execute simultaneously without adding time overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous data retention monitoring through regular scan operations rather than performing intermittent stress tests. This continuous assessment approach ensures that retention capability is constantly evaluated during normal operation, eliminating the time loss associated with stopping operations for dedicated stress testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If separate stress-inducing operations are performed, then data retention capability is accurately determined, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retention capability measurementVSAvoiddata throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes regular scan operations multi-functional by enabling them to simultaneously perform data retention assessment in addition to their primary scanning function. This universal approach eliminates the need for separate dedicated stress-test operations, allowing the same infrastructure to serve multiple purposes including retention monitoring, data verification, and performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the memory sub-system to self-assess its data retention capability using its own regular scan operations without requiring external stress-inducing operations. The system monitors its own data state metrics and automatically maps these to appropriate scan frequencies, making the retention assessment self-sufficient and eliminating the productivity loss associated with external testing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If stress-inducing operations are performed, then data retention capability is determined, but available storage space is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retention capability measurementVSAvoidavailable storage space
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the retention assessment function from dedicated stress-test storage regions and relocates it to regular user data scan operations. By taking out the measurement function from specialized test areas, the system can use all available storage space for productive purposes while still performing accurate retention monitoring through scans of normally accessed data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250217064A1Host data storage scan data retention rating
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250217064A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217064A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217064A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a memory device including a plurality of dies; and a processing device, operatively coupled with the memory device, to perform operations including: obtaining, by performing a plurality of scan operations on a die of the plurality of dies, a value of a data state metric characterizing the die; identifying, in a set of criteria, a particular criterion that is satisfied by the value of the data state metric, wherein each criterion of the set of criteria corresponds to a respective rating of a plurality of ratings; assigning, to the die, a rating corresponding to the particular criterion; and performing a plurality of subsequent scan operations on the die at a frequency determined by the rating.