Memory Device Differential Voltage State Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional nitride storage non-volatile memory (NVM) devices experience erroneous operations due to increased drain operation voltage or completion of program/erase cycles, leading to a retraction of the operating boundary and increased vulnerability to errors.

Innovation Solution

A memory device with a comparator and switching circuits that apply different operating voltages to generate working currents, which are then transformed into voltages to calculate a partial differential value, allowing for accurate determination of the program/erase state, thereby maintaining a fixed operating boundary across varying voltages and cycles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the drain operation voltage is increased, then the operating speed is improved, but the operating boundary retracts and erroneous actions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating speedVSAvoidoperating boundary stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for state determination from absolute voltage threshold to differential voltage (difference between first and second operating voltages). This parameter transformation allows the system to maintain reliable state detection even when absolute voltage levels shift due to DIBL effect or aging, thereby resolving the contradiction between operating speed and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism by comparing the differential voltage against a reference voltage to determine program/erase states. This feedback approach compensates for voltage fluctuations and boundary retraction, maintaining reliable operation at higher drain voltages without causing erroneous actions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the memory device performs program/erase cycles, then the data storage function is achieved, but the operating boundary retracts and vulnerability to errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram/erase operation capabilityVSAvoidoperating boundary stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the state detection parameter from absolute voltage to differential voltage, which remains stable throughout program/erase cycles. This parameter transformation eliminates the operating boundary retraction problem that occurs after cycles, maintaining reliability while preserving full program/erase functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary compensation by using differential voltage measurement that inherently compensates for threshold voltage shifts caused by program/erase cycles. This preliminary action prevents operating boundary retraction before it can affect subsequent operations, ensuring consistent reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If the conventional voltage threshold method is used, then the device structure is simple, but the operating boundary retracts leading to erroneous actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidoperating boundary stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the detection parameter from absolute voltage to differential voltage, which provides stability against operating boundary retraction. This parameter transformation achieves reliable operation without significantly increasing device complexity, as it can be implemented using existing voltage sources and comparison circuitry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents erroneous actions by maintaining a stable operating boundary, enabling reliable operation across multiple program/erase cycles and varying drain operation voltages, ensuring accurate state determination.

Implementation Method 1

Through hot electron or hot hole injection, the memory cell can be erased or programmed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHot electron or hot hole injection:

Implementation Method 2

The first passive device and the second passive device may be capacitors or resistors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOhm's Law: Ohm's Law

Implementation Method 3

The difference between the second working voltage and the first working voltage is divided by the difference between the second operating voltage and the first operating voltage to obtain a partial differential value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential voltage comparison:

Implementation Method 4

the operating voltage difference OM2 between the curves 101 and 103 is reduced to about 0.46V (1.66V−1.2V) due to the drain inductance barrier lowering (DIBL) effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrain inductance barrier lowering (DIBL) effect:

Data Source

PatentUS7385867B2Memory device and operating method thereof
Publication Date: 2008.06.10 WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US7385867B2 patent drawing
  • US7385867B2 patent drawing
  • US7385867B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a memory device adapted for determining a program/erase state of a memory cell in the memory device. The method includes applying a drain operation voltage to a drain of the memory cell so that the memory cell generates a working voltage. The working voltage is a function of the drain operation voltage. Then, the working voltage to the drain operation voltage is differentiated to obtain a slope of the working voltage to the drain operation voltage. The program/erase state of the memory cell is determined according to the slope.