Memory Gate Landing Pad Bridge for Split-Gate Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrating split-gate memory cells with other field-effect devices on the same substrate is challenging due to different fabrication requirements, leading to issues with cost, performance, and manufacturability.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the formation of a polysilicon layer on a substrate with features, including a dummy feature, a charge trapping dielectric, and a memory gate, where the memory gate forms a bridge between features, with a contact partially on the bridge, allowing for efficient integration of memory and non-memory devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If memory cells and non-memory devices are integrated on the same substrate, then device functionality and area utilization are improved, but fabrication complexity increases due to different fabrication parameters required by each device type

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice integrationVSAvoidfabrication process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The substrate is divided into a memory region containing split-gate memory cells and a non-memory region containing other field-effect devices, allowing each region to be optimized for its specific fabrication requirements while sharing the same substrate

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different fabrication parameters are applied to different regions of the substrate - the memory region receives processing optimized for split-gate cells while the non-memory region receives processing optimized for other device types, enabling co-integration despite different requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If the distance between features is reduced to allow closer device placement, then area utilization is improved, but the risk of bridging between features increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice placement densityVSAvoidbridging prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A mandrel structure is introduced as an intermediary element between closely spaced features during fabrication. The mandrel acts as a temporary spacer that prevents bridging during the formation process, allowing features to be placed closer together while maintaining reliability. The mandrel is subsequently removed after serving its protective function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9209197B2Memory gate landing pad made from dummy features
Publication Date: 2015.12.08 LONGITUDE FLASH MEMORY SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US9209197B2 patent drawing
  • US9209197B2 patent drawing
  • US9209197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein generally relate to landing gate pads for contacts and manufacturing methods therefor. A bridge is formed between two features to allow a contact to be disposed, at least partially, on the bridge. Landing the contact on the bridge avoids additional manufacturing steps to create a target for a contact.