Memory Interface Equalization for Multi-Level Signal Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-level signaling in memory devices is susceptible to errors due to reduced voltage separation between symbols, leading to inter-symbol interference and decreased signal integrity, especially when channel conditions limit the increase of peak-to-peak transmitted power.

Innovation Solution

Implementing programmable channel equalization by independently controlling de-emphasis or pre-emphasis adjustments and drive strength using separate signals, allowing for optimal ratios and improved linearity of multi-level signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If multi-level signaling is used to increase data density, then memory capacity is improved, but voltage separation between symbols is reduced leading to increased error rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory capacityVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pre-emphasis filtering to the transmitted signal before it enters the channel. This preliminary action boosts the high-frequency components of the signal proactively, compensating for the anticipated high-frequency loss in the channel and maintaining better voltage separation between multi-level symbols at the receiver

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements an equalization process that uses the received signal characteristics to adjust and compensate for channel-induced distortion. The receiver detects the degraded signal and applies corrective filtering to restore the voltage separation between symbols, reducing error rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If de-emphasis or pre-emphasis is applied using a single signal, then channel equalization is achieved, but the ratio between de-emphasis and drive strength is limited resulting in sub-optimal signal characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal integrityVSAvoidde-emphasis to drive strength ratio flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates the control of drive strength and de-emphasis/pre-emphasis into independent circuits with separate control signals. The drive strength is controlled by one signal while the equalization amount is controlled by another signal, allowing each parameter to be optimized independently for optimal signal characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables dynamic and independent adjustment of both drive strength and de-emphasis/pre-emphasis levels. This dynamic control allows the system to adapt to different channel conditions and signaling requirements, achieving optimal performance across varying operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If channel equalization is applied to compensate for inter-symbol interference, then signal detectability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal detectabilityVSAvoidequalization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a dedicated equalization circuit as an intermediary component between the transmitter and receiver. This separate equalization stage applies corrective filtering to compensate for channel distortion and inter-symbol interference, improving signal detectability while keeping the core memory device architecture relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10530617B2Programmable channel equalization for multi-level signaling
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US10530617B2 patent drawing
  • US10530617B2 patent drawing
  • US10530617B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A memory interface may include a transmitter that generates multi-level signals. The transmitter may employ channel equalization to improve the quality and robustness of the multi-level signals. The channel equalization may be controlled independently from the drive strength of the multi-level signals. For example, a first control signal may control the de-emphasis or pre-emphasis applied to a multi-level signal and a second control signal may control the drive strength of the multi-level signal. The first control signal may control a channel equalization driver circuit and the second control signal may control a driver circuit.