Memory Interface Rate Switching for Power and Latency Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gear management techniques for memory interfaces based on command frequency lead to increased power consumption and latency due to suboptimal data transfer rates, especially during infrequent large data transfers.

Innovation Solution

Implementing improved gear selection schemes where the host system adjusts the interface gear in response to parameters such as command size, queue depth, and historical communication patterns to switch between low and high data transfer rates dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the interface operates at a high data transfer rate continuously, then productivity is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transfer rateVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The interface dynamically adjusts its data transfer rate based on real-time command queue depth. When the queue depth exceeds a threshold, the interface operates at a higher data transfer rate to quickly clear the backlog. When the queue depth is low, the interface reduces to a lower data transfer rate to conserve power, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the interface by adjusting the data transfer rate according to command queue conditions. This parameter adjustment allows the interface to optimize between speed and power consumption based on actual workload, addressing the technical contradiction directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Use of energy by moving object

If the interface operates at a low data transfer rate to save power, then use of energy is reduced, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The interface dynamically switches between low and high data transfer rates based on command queue depth. When latency becomes critical (indicated by high queue depth), the interface transitions to high speed mode to reduce latency. When the system is idle or lightly loaded, it operates at low speed to save power, thus resolving the contradiction between energy efficiency and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system periodically monitors command queue depth and adjusts data transfer rate accordingly. This periodic adjustment ensures that the interface responds to changing workload conditions, switching between power-saving mode and performance mode to balance energy consumption and latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the interface switches rates frequently based on command frequency, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverate adjustment capabilityVSAvoidgear management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interface uses a simple parameter-based approach where data transfer rate is adjusted based on a single key parameter: command queue depth threshold. This simplifies the gear management logic compared to complex frequency-based adjustments, reducing device complexity while maintaining adaptability to different workload conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the command queue depth is continuously monitored and used to control data transfer rate adjustments. This feedback-based approach provides adaptability to changing conditions while keeping the control logic relatively simple, avoiding the need for complex predictive algorithms or multiple adjustment parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12504881B2Rate adjustments for a memory interface
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12504881B2 patent drawing
  • US12504881B2 patent drawing
  • US12504881B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for rate adjustments for a memory interface are described. A host system may communicate with a memory system via an interface according to multiple data transfer rates. For example, the host system may configure the interface to operate according to a first rate. The host system may switch the interface from the first rate to a second rate in response to one or more commands from the host system satisfying one or more parameters such as a threshold quantity of data associated with a command, a threshold quantity of issued commands associated with at least the threshold quantity of data, a threshold quantity of issued and unexecuted commands, or any combination thereof. Based on the switching, the host system may communicate with the memory system via the interface in accordance with the second rate.