Reinforcement Learning Memory Interface Tuning Under Device Variation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems face challenges in efficiently tuning high-speed dynamic random access memory (DRAM) parameters due to device-to-device variations and environmental changes, leading to sub-optimal performance and reliability, with existing methods like brute force and deep learning being time-consuming and ineffective for real-world deployments.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement learning (RL) model is employed to sample and tune DRAM parameters based on reward functions, optimizing stability and reducing power consumption by predicting optimal parameter settings through reduced sampling, using Bayesian optimization techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional brute force or deep learning methods are used to tune DRAM parameters, then parameter tuning can be performed, but the process is time-consuming and ineffective for real-world deployments

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDRAM stability and reliabilityVSAvoidparameter tuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a reinforcement learning framework where the tuning system receives feedback in the form of reward signals based on DRAM performance metrics. The system continuously adjusts parameters and evaluates outcomes, using this feedback loop to iteratively improve tuning accuracy while reducing time consumption compared to conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement learning agent performs autonomous parameter tuning without requiring external intervention or extensive manual configuration. The system self-learns optimal tuning strategies through interaction with the DRAM device, automatically adapting to device variations and environmental changes while minimizing tuning time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If extensive parameter sampling is performed to achieve optimal tuning, then tuning accuracy improves, but time consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter tuning accuracyVSAvoidtuning efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the tuning problem from exhaustive parameter sampling to intelligent parameter selection by changing the approach from brute-force evaluation to reinforcement learning-based parameter optimization. The system learns which parameter combinations are most promising and focuses sampling efforts there, achieving high accuracy with fewer samples.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of performing complete exhaustive sampling of all parameter combinations, the reinforcement learning system performs partial sampling focused on the most promising regions of the parameter space. This selective approach achieves sufficient tuning accuracy without the excessive time cost of complete enumeration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If DRAM is tuned during manufacturing only, then initial setup is simplified, but the system cannot adapt to changes in operating conditions and hardware degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to operating conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static manufacturing-time tuning to dynamic runtime tuning. The reinforcement learning system continuously adapts DRAM parameters during operation to respond to changing conditions such as temperature variations, voltage fluctuations, and hardware degradation, maintaining optimal performance throughout the device lifecycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary tuning during manufacturing to establish initial parameters, then uses reinforcement learning to perform additional preliminary adjustments at deployment and continuous fine-tuning during operation. This multi-stage approach maintains manufacturing simplicity while adding adaptability through automated runtime adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12387133B2Reinforcement learning based scheme for tuning memory interfaces
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 QUALCOMM INC
  • US12387133B2 patent drawing
  • US12387133B2 patent drawing
  • US12387133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method performed by a machine learning system includes generating a set of reward values based on a set of parameter values selected by a machine learning system, each reward value of the set of reward values corresponding to a parameter value of the set of parameter values programmed at a device. The method also includes determining a reward function for maximizing a reward corresponding to a set of parameters of the device based on the set of reward values. The method further includes tuning a parameter of the set of parameters based on the reward function.