Memory Chip Package Architecture with Mixed Process Regions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor manufacturing processes for monolithic ICs face challenges in miniaturization, performance, and yield due to the need for uniform optimization of all circuits on a planar surface, leading to decreased performance and increased costs, especially in memory devices like SRAM and DRAM, which require different manufacturing approaches.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a microelectronic assembly with multiple IC dies, each optimized for specific functionalities, such as SRAM and DRAM, using different process regions with varying transistor sizes and conductive trace pitches, connected through advanced interconnects like silicon interposers and EMIB, allowing for high-density interconnections and efficient power delivery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If monolithic IC fabrication is used to integrate multiple memory types on a single planar surface, then integration is achieved, but manufacturing precision and performance deteriorate due to the inability to optimize each memory type independently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration of multiple memory typesVSAvoidperformance optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monolithic IC into multiple process regions, each dedicated to fabricating a specific memory type (e.g., SRAM region, DRAM region). This segmentation allows each region to be optimized independently with specialized transistor sizes, conductive trace pitches, and manufacturing processes, resolving the contradiction between integration and performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If uniform transistor sizes and conductive trace pitches are used across the entire IC, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but performance and miniaturization are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidperformance and miniaturization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by assigning different transistor sizes and conductive trace pitches to different process regions based on their specific memory type requirements. For example, SRAM regions use larger transistors with wider trace pitches for stability, while DRAM regions use smaller transistors with tighter trace pitches for high density. This local customization enables both manufacturing feasibility and superior performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If a single fabrication process is used for all memory circuits, then process complexity is reduced, but yield and cost-effectiveness decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication process complexityVSAvoidyield and cost-effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fabrication process into multiple specialized processes, each tailored to a specific memory type's requirements. This allows each memory region to be manufactured with optimal process parameters, thereby improving yield and cost-effectiveness despite the increased overall process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Stability of the object's composition

If all circuits are optimized uniformly on a planar surface, then design consistency is maintained, but miniaturization and high-density interconnections are hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign consistencyVSAvoiddevice size and density
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different process regions to have different design characteristics optimized for their specific functions. This enables high-density interconnections in regions where needed while maintaining appropriate design consistency within each specialized region, thereby achieving miniaturization without sacrificing design integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240222321A1Package architecture with memory chips having different process regions
Publication Date: 2024.07.04 INTEL CORP
  • US20240222321A1 patent drawing
  • US20240222321A1 patent drawing
  • US20240222321A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of a microelectronic assembly include: a first integrated circuit (IC) die having a first memory circuit and a second memory circuit; a second IC die; a third IC die; and a package substrate. The second IC die is between the first IC die and the package substrate. The first IC die includes: a first portion comprising a first active region and a first backend region in contact with the first active region; and a second portion comprising a second active region and a second backend region in contact with the second active region. The first memory circuit is in the first portion, the second memory circuit is in the second portion, the first active region comprises transistors that are larger than transistors in the second active region, and the first backend region comprises conductive traces that have a larger pitch than conductive traces in the second backend region.