Memory Arrangement Automatic Performance Tuning Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional computers lack the ability to fine-tune memory components for maximum efficiency, resulting in significant latency during operations like writing to memory, which interferes with ongoing computer activities and does not provide flexibility or user input for desired performance levels.

Innovation Solution

A memory arrangement with automatic performance tuning (APT) capabilities, including a processor that selects performance profile targets, detects workloads, configures a command performance statistics monitor, measures and adjusts performance using an algorithm to match desired targets, and incorporates machine learning for continuous optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If write operations are performed on memory arrangement, then data is stored, but latency increases and computer activities are stalled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata storageVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The memory arrangement dynamically adjusts its operational mode based on detected workload characteristics. The system transitions between different performance states (performance mode and power save mode) to optimize the balance between data storage reliability and latency performance according to actual usage patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as cache allocation, write buffer size, and performance profile settings to optimize the trade-off between storage reliability and latency. By adjusting these parameters based on workload detection, the system can minimize latency during critical operations while ensuring data storage integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If conventional memory arrangements are used, then simplicity is maintained, but performance tuning capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesimplicityVSAvoidperformance tuning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The memory arrangement performs automatic performance tuning through embedded workload detection and performance profile matching mechanisms. The system automatically selects and applies appropriate performance profiles without requiring manual user configuration, thereby maintaining simplicity while gaining adaptive performance tuning capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts its performance characteristics by detecting workload patterns and automatically selecting from multiple predefined performance profiles. This dynamic adaptation provides versatility in performance tuning while maintaining a simple interface for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If performance is optimized for specific workloads, then efficiency increases, but adaptability to varying computer activities decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to varying activities
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The memory arrangement incorporates multiple performance profiles that can handle different types of workloads (sequential access, random access, read-intensive, write-intensive, etc.). The workload detection mechanism identifies the current activity type and selects the appropriate performance profile, providing both optimized efficiency for specific workloads and broad adaptability to varying computer activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different performance profiles based on real-time workload detection. This dynamic profile selection allows the memory arrangement to maintain optimized efficiency for the current workload type while remaining adaptable to transitions between different activity types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Loss of time

If automatic performance tuning is implemented, then latency is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automatic performance tuning functionality is implemented as a self-contained subsystem within the memory arrangement that autonomously performs workload detection, profile matching, and parameter adjustment. This self-service approach reduces latency through automated optimization while minimizing the impact on overall device complexity by encapsulating the tuning logic within dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a workload detection mechanism and performance profile selection layer as an intermediary between the host controller and the physical memory operations. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of performance tuning internally, reducing latency through intelligent scheduling while keeping the interface to the host simple and unchanged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10423525B2Automatic performance tuning for memory arrangements
Publication Date: 2019.09.24 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US10423525B2 patent drawing
  • US10423525B2 patent drawing
  • US10423525B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement is disclosed comprising a memory arrangement configured to store and retrieve data; an interface to allow data to be received and transmitted by the arrangement from a host and a processor configured to dynamically conduct automatic performance tuning for the memory arrangement.