Memory Access Pipeline Arbitration for Multi-CPU Cache Coherence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scalability challenges arise in memory architectures when adding powerful CPUs, particularly when multiple CPUs share a common address space, leading to increased processing demands and latency due to cache coherence requirements.

Innovation Solution

A coherent memory system with a central processing unit (CPU) and multiple levels of caches, including a pipeline for data access, where requests are arbitrated to manage cache transactions and maintain coherence across multiple CPUs, reducing latency and enhancing data security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple CPUs share a common address space with cache coherence requirements, then data security and coherence are improved, but processing demands and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecache coherenceVSAvoidaccess latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The memory address space is segmented into different protection domains, each with its own cache coherence management. The pipeline is divided into multiple stages that handle different types of memory requests independently, allowing simultaneous operations without interfering with each other. This segmentation enables the system to maintain cache coherence across multiple CPUs while reducing access latency by processing requests in parallel rather than sequentially.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If cache is configured to protect certain areas from CPU access, then data security is improved, but processing power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidprocessing power
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

A dedicated pipeline structure acts as an intermediary between memory requests and the protected cache areas. The pipeline includes arbitration logic and protection domains that mediate access rights, allowing the system to enforce data security policies without requiring excessive processing power from the CPUs themselves. The pipeline handles security checks and coherence management centrally, reducing the processing burden on individual CPUs while maintaining strong data protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If multiple requestors access data simultaneously, then productivity is improved, but arbitration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidarbitration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arbitration mechanism is made dynamic by implementing priority-based request handling and adaptive pipeline control. The system can adjust the priority of different requestors based on current system conditions, allowing critical operations to proceed while less critical ones wait. This dynamic arbitration approach enables multiple requestors to access data simultaneously when safe to do so, improving productivity without requiring overly complex static arbitration logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240264955A1Multiple-requestor memory access pipeline and arbiter
Publication Date: 2024.08.08 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US20240264955A1 patent drawing
  • US20240264955A1 patent drawing
  • US20240264955A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In described examples, a coherent memory system includes a central processing unit (CPU) and first and second level caches. The memory system can include a pipeline for accessing data stored in one of the caches. Requestors can access the data stored in one of the caches by sending requests at a same time that can be arbitrated by the pipeline.