Memory Placement by Signal Capability for Substrate Signal Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing techniques for memory devices do not consider process variations in memory components, leading to suboptimal performance due to varying supply voltages and signal integrity issues caused by random placement on substrates.

Innovation Solution

Optimize memory device placement by labeling memories based on individual performance parameters and positioning them relative to electrical components like PMIC, RCD, and edge connector to align with their signal processing capabilities, ensuring better signal quality and power efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If memory devices are randomly placed on a substrate, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but performance is suboptimal due to varying supply voltages and signal integrity issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement simplicityVSAvoidsignal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating memory device placement based on their individual performance characteristics. Memory devices are categorized into performance groups and placed in specific regions of the substrate: higher-performance devices are positioned farther from electrical components, while lower-performance devices are placed closer to electrical components. This localized differentiation optimizes signal integrity for each device based on its specific capabilities, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and signal integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If memory devices are randomly placed on a substrate, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but power consumption is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement simplicityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces power consumption by applying local quality principles to memory device placement. By categorizing memory devices into performance groups and strategically positioning them based on their characteristics, the system optimizes power efficiency. Lower-performance devices placed closer to electrical components receive more robust power delivery, while higher-performance devices farther away operate more efficiently with reduced power demands, thereby reducing overall power consumption while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If memory devices are randomly placed on a substrate, then device complexity is minimized, but processing speed is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement complexityVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by testing memory devices before placement to determine their performance parameters and categorizing them into performance groups. This pre-characterization enables strategic placement that optimizes processing speed without increasing placement complexity during manufacturing. The performance-based categorization and positioning are established in advance, allowing the system to achieve faster processing speeds while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12626731B2Methods for optimizing semiconductor device placement on a substrate for improved performance, and associated systems and methods
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12626731B2 patent drawing
  • US12626731B2 patent drawing
  • US12626731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of optimizing the placement of memories in a memory device including a substrate and an electrical component, and associated devices and systems, are disclosed herein. A representative method includes first testing the memories to determine at least one parameter for each of the memories indicating an ability of the memory to process signals from the electrical component. The method can further include labeling each memory with a label based on the parameter, the labels including at least a first label and a second label. The first label can indicate that the memories with the first label are better able to process signals from the electrical component than the memories with the second label. The method can further include electrically coupling the memories to the substrate such that the memories with the second label are positioned closer to the electrical component than the memories with the first label.