Memory Row Tracking With Ping-Pong Counters for Row Hammer Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing row hammer detection algorithms are probabilistic and memory-intensive, leaving vulnerabilities for data corruption, and existing methods fail to effectively prevent data loss due to memory cell leakage, especially with decreasing row hammer thresholds in modern memory systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a control mechanism in the memory sub-system's back-end that utilizes multiple counters to track access patterns over time, refreshing rows based on activation and pre-charge command intervals to mitigate row hammer attacks, using a space-saving algorithm to retain data between refresh windows.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If probabilistic row hammer detection algorithms are used, then some row hammer attacks may be detected, but memory usage increases and data corruption vulnerabilities remain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverow hammer detection capabilityVSAvoidmemory usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the row tracking function into multiple independent counters, where each counter tracks a specific row's access pattern. This segmentation allows the system to monitor row hammer attacks on individual rows without requiring a large centralized data structure, thereby reducing overall memory usage while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The counters automatically track row access patterns and trigger refresh operations when thresholds are exceeded, without requiring complex probabilistic algorithms or external intervention. This self-service mechanism eliminates the need for memory-intensive detection algorithms while providing reliable row hammer mitigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If existing row hammer detection methods are implemented, then some protection is provided, but they fail to prevent data loss due to memory cell leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protection capabilityVSAvoidmemory cell leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary tracking of row activation patterns and proactively triggers refresh operations before memory cell leakage can cause data corruption. By monitoring access patterns and predicting potential row hammer attacks, the system refreshes affected rows in advance, preventing data loss from capacitor discharge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The counters provide continuous feedback on row access patterns to the refresh control logic, which adjusts refresh timing based on actual usage patterns. This feedback mechanism ensures that rows under attack are refreshed timely, counteracting memory cell leakage effects while optimizing refresh operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If row refresh operations are performed frequently to prevent row hammer attacks, then data corruption is prevented, but memory performance and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidmemory access performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts refresh frequency based on actual row access patterns captured by the counters. Instead of performing fixed frequent refreshes, the system refreshes only when the counter thresholds indicate potential row hammer attacks, thereby maintaining data integrity while minimizing performance impact on normal memory operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The refresh timing parameters are changed from fixed intervals to variable intervals based on counter values. When counter thresholds are exceeded, refresh operations are triggered; otherwise, normal operation continues uninterrupted. This parameter change allows the system to maintain reliability while preserving productivity during normal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260011357A1Row tracking for row hammer mitigation
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20260011357A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011357A1 patent drawing
  • US20260011357A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control mechanism may be implemented in a back-end of a memory sub-system to refresh rows of a memory device. Rows of the memory device can be refreshed based on a quantity of times the rows have been updated in a duration of time. Rows of the memory device can also be updated based on a duration of time between receipt of the activation command for the row and a pre-charge command for the row. Row of the memory device clan further be updated utilizing a pair of counters that implement a ping pong mechanism to retain data between different consecutive durations of time.