Memory Device Program Disturb Mitigation via Segmented Control Lines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional memory devices face data corruption issues due to 'program disturb' during programming, where voltage differences between control lines can inject stray charges into memory cells, corrupting stored data, and existing self-boosting techniques introduce additional electric field-related problems.

Innovation Solution

A programming process involving a sequence of two pulse patterns is executed: an inhibit-pulse pattern, where lower voltages are asserted on drain-side control lines compared to source-side control lines, and a program-pulse pattern, where lower voltages are asserted on source-side control lines compared to drain-side control lines, to reduce data corruption by minimizing electric field strength and enhancing self-boosting effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional self-boosting techniques are used to mitigate program disturb, then data protection is improved, but electric field strength increases causing stray charge injection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protectionVSAvoidelectric field strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control lines are segmented into different groups (first group and second group) with different voltage levels applied during programming. This segmentation allows independent control of voltage distribution to mitigate program disturb while controlling electric field strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different voltage levels are applied to different groups of control lines based on their specific positions and roles. The first group of control lines receives a first voltage level while the second group receives a second voltage level, creating localized voltage differences that protect specific memory cells from program disturb.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If voltage differences are asserted between control lines to protect unselected memory cells, then program disturb is reduced, but stray charge injection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogram disturb protectionVSAvoidstray charge injection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies voltage differences between control lines in a controlled sequence during the programming operation. By establishing these voltage differences before and during the programming pulse, the system pre-prevents program disturb while managing electric field effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes voltage parameters dynamically during programming by asserting different voltage levels on different control line groups. This parameter change allows the system to optimize protection against program disturb while controlling the magnitude of electric fields to minimize stray charge injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces the likelihood of data corruption during programming by pre-charging unselected memory cells and maintaining lower electric fields, thereby protecting unselected memory cells from data corruption while ensuring efficient programming of selected memory cells.

Implementation Method 1

the unselected control lines capacitively couple to the unselected data lines, and this capacitive coupling counteracts the effect of the program voltage on the unselected memory cells connected to the selected control line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive coupling: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

Electric fields from the pass voltages drive charges toward the memory cells that are at highest risk of program disturb

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field: Electric Field

Implementation Method 3

A programming process involving a sequence of two pulse patterns is executed: an inhibit-pulse pattern, where lower voltages are asserted on drain-side control lines compared to source-side control lines, and a program-pulse pattern, where lower voltages are asserted on source-side control lines compared to drain-side control lines, to reduce data corruption by minimizing electric field strength

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS7965548B2Systems and devices including memory resistant to program disturb and methods of using, making, and operating the same
Publication Date: 2011.06.21 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US7965548B2 patent drawing
  • US7965548B2 patent drawing
  • US7965548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods, systems and devices, one such device being a memory device configured to concurrently assert a first pulse pattern through a plurality of conductors disposed on both a source side and a drain side of a floating-gate transistor, wherein a source side of the first pulse pattern has a different median voltage than a drain side of the first pulse pattern.