Memory Traffic Analyzer for Dynamic Address Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current memory address mapping methods, such as RCB and BRC, do not optimize memory bandwidth effectively, especially in scenarios with random memory accesses, requiring manual analysis that is labor-intensive and not guaranteed to produce optimal results.

Innovation Solution

A method that selects bank group, bank, and column subsets of bits based on standard deviation and toggle rates to generate an optimal memory address mapping, using a two-stage approach to analyze system traffic and convert system memory addresses to local memory addresses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual analysis is used to determine customized address mapping, then adaptability to traffic patterns is improved, but productivity is worsened due to labor-intensive process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to traffic patternsVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing memory traffic patterns and generating optimized address mappings without human intervention. The memory controller autonomously monitors access patterns, computes statistics, and determines optimal mappings, eliminating the need for manual analysis while maintaining adaptability to different traffic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual analysis process with an automated computational system. Instead of human experts manually examining traffic patterns and designing mappings, the system uses algorithms to automatically analyze patterns and generate optimized address mappings, significantly improving productivity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If fixed address mapping methods (RCB or BRC) are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different access patterns is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidadaptability to access patterns
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic address mapping where the mapping configuration adapts based on observed memory access patterns. The system continuously monitors traffic patterns and adjusts the address mapping strategy accordingly, transitioning from static fixed mappings to dynamic adaptive mappings that optimize performance for different access patterns without requiring complex manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes mapping parameters automatically based on detected access patterns. By monitoring characteristics such as spatial and temporal locality, the system adjusts mapping parameters to optimize performance for different workload types, maintaining low complexity while achieving high adaptability through automated parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If standard address mapping methods are used, then ease of operation is improved, but memory bandwidth performance is worsened due to access overheads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmemory bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The memory controller performs self-service by automatically optimizing address mappings to reduce access overheads. The system autonomously analyzes traffic patterns and configures mappings that minimize bank conflicts and improve spatial locality, thereby enhancing memory bandwidth performance without requiring manual intervention or sacrificing ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where memory access patterns are continuously monitored and used to refine address mapping strategies. By incorporating feedback from actual traffic patterns, the system automatically adjusts mappings to reduce overheads and improve bandwidth performance while maintaining ease of operation through automated optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10860473B1Memory traffic analyzer
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 XILINX INC
  • US10860473B1 patent drawing
  • US10860473B1 patent drawing
  • US10860473B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples herein describe a method for memory address mapping. In one embodiment, the method includes selecting a bank group subset of bits from a plurality of bits that represent a memory address; selecting a bank address subset of bits from the plurality of bits; selecting a column subset of bits from the plurality of bits, wherein the column subset of bits is exclusive from the bank group subset of bits and the bank address subset of bits; and generating an optimal memory address mapping for converting system memory addresses into the plurality of local memory addresses for the memory banks using the bank group subset of bits, the bank address subset of bits, and the column subset of bits.