Memristor Crossbar Weight Mapping for Neural Network Hardware

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing neural networks face challenges in efficiently implementing negative weights and adapting to software-level flexibility at the hardware level, leading to undesirable latency and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A neural network system with two sets of weights connected by a mathematical relationship, utilizing memristor crossbars and electronic components, allows for hardware-level implementation with positive weights and software-level training, incorporating excitatory and inhibitory neurons to enhance pattern recognition and learning capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If hardware-based neural networks are constructed to improve computational efficiency, then processing speed is improved, but adaptability to software-level flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidadaptability to software-level flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the neural network implementation into two distinct parts: a hardware-based first set of weights for efficient computational operations and a software-based second set of weights for flexible adaptation. This segmentation allows each component to optimize for its specific function, with the hardware providing speed and the software providing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism that bridges the hardware and software weight sets through mathematical relationships. This intermediary allows the system to leverage both the computational efficiency of hardware and the flexibility of software, resolving the contradiction between speed and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Power

If negative weights are implemented in hardware-based neural networks to improve computational capability, then processing capability is improved, but implementation complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational capabilityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the negative weight implementation complexity from the hardware layer by placing it in the software layer. The hardware only handles positive weights, which are simpler to implement, while the software component manages the complexity of negative weights through mathematical transformations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation by transforming negative weights into positive weights through mathematical relationships. This parameter transformation allows the hardware to operate with simpler positive values while maintaining the computational capability to handle negative weights through software-based mathematical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional techniques are used to implement hardware and software steps to avoid negative weight complexity, then implementation complexity is reduced, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation complexityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the hardware and software weight sets into a unified system where both components work together seamlessly. By combining the computational efficiency of hardware with the flexibility of software through mathematical relationships, the system achieves both low complexity and low latency performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary mathematical transformations and weight mappings in advance, allowing the hardware to operate efficiently without introducing latency. The software component prepares and transforms weights beforehand, enabling the hardware to execute operations at optimal speed without additional processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250284925A1Artificial neural network
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 CYBERSWARM INC
  • US20250284925A1 patent drawing
  • US20250284925A1 patent drawing
  • US20250284925A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A neural network system is provided. The neural network system may include an input layer configured to receive an input signal. The neural network system may also include a first set of weights downstream of the input layer. The neural network system may further include a second set of weights downstream of the input layer, the second set of weights being connected by a mathematical relationship to the first set of weights. The neural network system may additionally include an output layer, downstream of the first set of weights and the second set of weights and configured to generate an output signal in response to the input signal.