MEMS Acceleration Sensor Error Correction via Electrostatic Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Miniaturized acceleration sensors produced by MEMS technologies suffer from significant systematic errors due to manufacturing deviations, which are difficult and costly to correct using existing methods that require special devices and are time-intensive.

Innovation Solution

An error-correction method for acceleration sensors that involves applying voltages to deflect the seismic mass, measuring currents at different electrodes, and determining correction variables to account for temperature fluctuations and cross-talk errors, allowing for systematic error correction without redesigning the sensor.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing error-correction methods are used to eliminate systematic errors, then measurement accuracy is improved, but special measuring devices and time-intensive processes are required, increasing cost and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidspecial measuring devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the acceleration sensor itself perform the error-correction function by using its existing electrodes to both deflect the seismic mass and detect the deflection. This multi-functional use of the sensor's components eliminates the need for separate correction devices while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The acceleration sensor corrects its own systematic errors by utilizing its built-in electrodes to generate deflection and detect the resulting currents. The sensor serves itself by comparing measured currents at different electrodes to calculate correction factors, eliminating dependency on external correction equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If existing error-correction methods are used to eliminate systematic errors, then measurement accuracy is improved, but time-intensive measurement processes increase production time and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidtime-intensive processes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs error-correction measurements during the normal operation of the sensor rather than requiring separate pre-characterization steps. By continuously or periodically measuring currents at different electrodes and calculating correction factors, the system eliminates time-intensive separate calibration processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The error-correction process is integrated into the normal measurement operation, allowing correction factors to be continuously updated without interrupting the sensor's useful function. This eliminates idle time between measurement and correction steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Device complexity

If the seismic mass deflection is used only for checking sensor functioning, then the sensor structure remains simple, but systematic errors cannot be corrected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor structureVSAvoidsystematic error correction
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the deflection detection capability to serve dual purposes: both checking sensor functioning and measuring currents for error-correction calculations. By analyzing the ratio of currents at different electrodes during deflection, the system extracts correction information without requiring additional hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter being measured from simple presence/absence of deflection to the quantitative ratio of currents at different electrodes. This parameter transformation enables extraction of correction factors from existing measurements without modifying the sensor structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables cost-effective correction of systematic errors in acceleration sensors, improving measurement accuracy across various temperatures and directions, reducing the need for specialized equipment and time-intensive processes.

Implementation Method 1

Applying a voltage in order to deflect the seismic mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS8156783B2Error-correction method and error-correction device for an acceleration sensor
Publication Date: 2012.04.17 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US8156783B2 patent drawing
  • US8156783B2 patent drawing
  • US8156783B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An error-correction method for an acceleration sensor having a plurality of electrodes and a seismic mass. The error-correction method which makes it possible to correct systematic errors at low expense includes the following steps: applying a voltage in order to deflect the seismic mass; measuring a first current caused by the deflection of the seismic mass; measuring a second current caused by the deflection of the seismic mass; and determining a correction variable on the basis of the first current and the second current.