Three-axis MEMS Accelerometer with Differential Proof Mass

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MEMS accelerometers face challenges in reducing die size while maintaining sensitivity and reliability, particularly when implementing a single proof mass design for multiple axis sensing.

Innovation Solution

The use of a spring structure that enables translational motion of a proof mass with differential sections to detect acceleration forces in three orthogonal directions, optimizing sense electrode placement and enhancing restoring force to minimize stiction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a single proof mass design is implemented for multiple axis sensing, then die size is reduced, but sensitivity and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedie sizeVSAvoidsensitivity and reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The proof mass is divided into differential sections (first section with first mass, second section with second mass) that move in opposite directions in response to acceleration forces. This segmentation allows the single proof mass to maintain high sensitivity and reliability across multiple axes by creating differential measurement capabilities that reduce noise and improve detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the proof mass are designed with different mass properties (first mass vs. second mass) to optimize sensing performance for different axes. The spring system is also configured with different stiffness characteristics for different directions, allowing local optimization of sensitivity while maintaining a compact single-proof-mass structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a single proof mass design is implemented for multiple axis sensing, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The proof mass is divided into differential sections (first section with first mass, second section with second mass) that move in opposite directions in response to acceleration forces. This segmentation allows the single proof mass to maintain high sensitivity and reliability across multiple axes by creating differential measurement capabilities that reduce noise and improve detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple sensing capabilities for three orthogonal axes are merged into a single proof mass structure. The spring system connects both sections to a common anchor, and the capacitive sensing mechanism is integrated to detect motion in multiple directions, achieving multi-axis sensing functionality within a unified compact design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If proof mass sections move in opposite directions, then sensing sensitivity is enhanced, but stiction risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensing sensitivityVSAvoidstiction-related malfunctions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring system is configured to provide restoring forces that act as counterweights to the inertial forces experienced by the proof mass sections. This ensures that both sections are continuously pulled toward their neutral positions, preventing them from adhering to the substrate during acceleration events and minimizing stiction-related malfunctions while maintaining differential motion for enhanced sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a smaller device size with enhanced sensitivity and reliability, reducing the likelihood of stiction-related malfunctions and improving performance by allowing uniform displacement of the proof mass for efficient sensing.

Implementation Method 1

a spring system interconnected between the anchor and the first and second sections of the proof mass. The spring system is configured to enable translational motion of the first and second sections of the proof mass in response to linear acceleration forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a proof mass spaced apart from a planar surface of a substrate, the proof mass having a first section and a second section... in response to linear acceleration forces imposed on the inertial sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 3

The movement of the movable structure changes capacitance, and an electrical circuit connected to the MEMS accelerometer structure measures the change in capacitance to determine the acceleration forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS10429407B2Three-axis inertial sensor for detecting linear acceleration forces
Publication Date: 2019.10.01 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US10429407B2 patent drawing
  • US10429407B2 patent drawing
  • US10429407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inertial sensor includes a proof mass spaced apart from a surface of a substrate. The proof mass has a first section and a second section, where the first section has a first mass that is greater than a second mass of the second section. An anchor is coupled to the surface of the substrate and a spring system is interconnected between the anchor and the first and second sections of the proof mass. The spring system enables translational motion of the first and second sections of the proof mass in response to linear acceleration forces imposed on the inertial sensor in any of three orthogonal directions.