MEMS Anti-Stiction Structure Using Repulsive Element

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microelectromechanical devices (MEMS) face the issue of stiction, where mobile structures adhere to fixed elements or substrates due to surface forces, leading to operational failures, especially under conditions of continuous contact and material particle formation from surface impacts.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an anti-stiction structure in MEMS devices, which includes a flexible element with a higher elastic constant than suspension springs and a stop element, designed to reduce contact forces by generating a repulsive force that opposes stiction, thereby preventing adhesion and minimizing surface wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mobile structures are allowed to move freely without anti-stiction protection, then device operation is simple and structure is basic, but stiction occurs causing adhesion to fixed elements and operational failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a repulsive element as an intermediary component between the mobile structure and the substrate. This element generates a repulsive force that mediates the interaction, preventing direct contact and adhesion between the mobile structure and substrate, thereby solving the stiction problem without requiring fundamental changes to the device architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The repulsive element is positioned and configured to generate a repulsive force before the mobile structure can adhere to the substrate. By establishing this counteracting force in advance, the system prevents stiction from occurring rather than correcting it after adhesion begins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If continuous contact between mobile and fixed structures is allowed, then device operation is straightforward, but progressive surface degradation and particle formation occur leading to stiction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface integrityVSAvoidanti-stiction structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The repulsive element acts as a cushioning mechanism that prevents direct impact and continuous contact between the mobile structure and fixed elements. By absorbing and distributing forces before they can cause surface degradation, the system protects surface integrity without requiring complex protective coatings or materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If surface contact area is increased to improve device performance, then device functionality is enhanced, but stiction force increases proportionally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoidstiction force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The repulsive element introduces a new force interaction that is independent of the contact area between mobile and fixed structures. This intermediary force counteracts stiction regardless of the extent of surface contact, allowing performance optimization without proportionally increasing adhesion forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces the likelihood of stiction between mobile and fixed structures in MEMS devices, minimizing surface degradation and ensuring continuous operation by maintaining separation between moving parts even under external forces.

Implementation Method 1

a repulsive element (2), in particular having a non-linear elastic behavior, which exerts on the mobile structure a repulsive force opposite in direction to the stiction force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8736405B2Microelectromechanical device provided with an anti-stiction structure, and corresponding anti-stiction method
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 STMICROELECTRONICS SRL
  • US8736405B2 patent drawing
  • US8736405B2 patent drawing
  • US8736405B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of a microelectromechanical device having a first structural element, a second structural element, which is mobile with respect to the first structural element, and an elastic supporting structure, which extends between the first and second structural elements to enable a relative movement between the first and second structural elements. The microelectromechanical device moreover possesses an anti-stiction structure, which includes at least one flexible element, which is fixed only with respect to the first structural element and, in a condition of rest, is set at a first distance from the second structural element. The anti-stiction structure is designed to generate a repulsive force between the first and second structural elements in the case of relative movement by an amount greater than the first distance.