MEMS Cavity Etching with Variable Trench Depths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing manufacturing processes for microelectromechanical system (MEMS) structures are not entirely satisfactory as device scaling-down continues, particularly due to inadequate control over etching processes that result in suboptimal yield and performance.

Innovation Solution

The method involves adjusting etching processes to account for the loading effect by using specific etching gases and power settings to form MEMS structures with varying widths, including a main etching process and an over-etching process with distinct steps to control etching rates and prevent over-etching, thereby improving yield and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If existing manufacturing processes are used for MEMS structures, then general adequacy for intended purposes is achieved, but yield and performance are suboptimal due to inadequate control over etching processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching process controlVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The etching process is divided into multiple distinct steps (main etching process, over-etching process, and cleaning process) with different parameters and objectives. Each step targets specific regions or functions, allowing precise control over the etching rate and depth for different structures within the MEMS device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic adjustment of etching parameters including gas flow rates, power settings, and pressure conditions during different process steps. The etching rate is dynamically controlled to account for loading effects, where wider openings etch faster than narrower ones, requiring real-time parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Length of moving object

If device scaling-down continues, then miniaturization is achieved, but existing manufacturing processes become inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice dimensionVSAvoidprocess adequacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different etching parameters and process conditions are applied to different regions of the substrate based on local requirements. Wider openings receive different etching treatment compared to narrower openings, with customized gas flows and power settings optimized for each opening size to maintain precision during scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically changes multiple process parameters including RF power, gas flow rates, and pressure to optimize etching performance at different device scales. These parameter adjustments compensate for loading effects and maintain consistent etching quality across varying feature sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If etching processes are not adjusted for loading effect, then process simplicity is maintained, but yield is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess complexityVSAvoidyield
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The process includes preliminary steps to prepare the substrate and pattern layers before etching, with specific attention to ensuring uniform thickness and proper alignment. Over-etching steps are planned in advance to compensate for variations in etching rate across different opening widths, preventing yield loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-step etching process incorporates feedback mechanisms where process parameters are adjusted based on observed etching rates and loading effects. The over-etching step serves as a feedback-driven compensation mechanism to ensure complete penetration through varying thicknesses while maintaining control over final dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the yield of MEMS structures by more than 50% and improves their performance by carefully managing etching rates and preventing damage during the manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

etching a MEMS substrate to form a number of openings in the MEMS substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching:

Implementation Method 2

depositing insulating or dielectric layers, conductive layers, and semiconductive layers of material over a semiconductor substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS10654713B2Method for manufacturing microelectromechanical system structure having a cavity and through-holes of different widths
Publication Date: 2020.05.19 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US10654713B2 patent drawing
  • US10654713B2 patent drawing
  • US10654713B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for manufacturing MEMS structures are provided. The method for manufacturing a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) structure includes etching a MEMS substrate to form a first trench and a second trench and etching the MEMS substrate through the first trench and the second trench to form a first through hole and an extended second trench. The method for manufacturing a MEMS structure further includes etching the MEMS substrate through the extended second trench to form a second through hole. In addition, a height of the first trench is greater than ¾ of a height of the MEMS substrate, and a height of the second trench is smaller than ⅔ of the height of the MEMS substrate.