MEMS Movable Element with Differential Gaps for Shock Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MEMS devices are prone to damage from shock loads and external fluidic pressure due to unintentional contact between electronic elements, leading to potential damage and particle generation.

Innovation Solution

A MEMS device design with a movable element featuring different gap distances along a disturbance direction, allowing for a contact region that acts as a stop, preventing contact between elements and protecting electronic components, while maintaining a compact design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a compact MEMS device design is used, then device size is reduced and mass is decreased, but electronic elements become more susceptible to unintentional contact under shock loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidsusceptibility to unintentional contact
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device is segmented into distinct functional regions: a contact region where the movable element can safely contact the further element under shock loads, and a protection region where electronic elements are positioned to avoid contact. This spatial segmentation allows the device to be compact while protecting sensitive components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The contact region acts as an intermediary zone between the movable element and electronic elements. Under normal operation, the movable element operates in this region, and under shock loads, it can contact the further element in this region without damaging electronic components, thus mediating the impact protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If additional protection elements are added to prevent unintentional contact, then reliability under shock loads is improved, but device complexity and mass increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection under shock loadsVSAvoidnumber of additional elements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The further element serves multiple functions: it forms part of the device structure, defines the contact region boundary, and acts as a protective stop for the movable element under shock loads. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate protection elements, reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The protection function is merged into the existing device structure by positioning electronic elements in the protection region and using the further element as both a structural component and a protective barrier. This integration avoids adding separate protection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If gap distances are increased to prevent contact under shock loads, then protection is improved, but device volume and mass increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact preventionVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Different gap distances are used in different regions of the device. The first gap distance in the contact region is smaller, allowing compact design, while the second gap distance in the protection region is larger, providing protection under shock loads. This local differentiation optimizes both compactness and protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If a single uniform gap distance is used, then device design is simplified, but protection under shock loads is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegap distance designVSAvoidshock load protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device employs different gap distances in different regions: a first gap distance for the contact region and a second, larger gap distance for the protection region. This local quality differentiation ensures that the device remains simple in design while providing adequate protection under shock loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250320112A1MEMS device
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20250320112A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320112A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320112A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A MEMS device. The MEMS device includes at least one movably mounted element, which performs a useful movement along a useful direction relative to a further element of the MEMS device. The movable element is for interaction with a fluid, such as a gas or a liquid. The movable element includes first and second portions. The further includes further first and second portions. The first portion has a first gap distance from the further first portion in a disturbance direction of the movable element. The second portion has a second gap distance from the further second portion in the disturbance direction of the movable element. A movement of the movably mounted element along the disturbance direction is caused by an external load, such as an external impact. The first gap distance is smaller than the second gap distance. The first portion and the further first portion form a contact region between the movable element and the further element.