Dynamic Offset Correction for MEMS Sensor Calibration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional MEMS devices face challenges in improving calibration techniques, particularly in reducing size, increasing performance, and decreasing cost, while requiring complex microsystems with greater computational power, and often necessitate elaborate in-factory calibration and orientation-dependent measurement processes.

Innovation Solution

A microprocessor-implemented method for dynamic offset correction (DOC) in MEMS devices, which calibrates sensor parameters during normal operation by measuring static acceleration, using gravity as a reference to estimate and correct 3-axis offsets without needing device orientation, and can be triggered by the user or run in the background, allowing for flexible and low-power operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional calibration techniques are used for MEMS devices, then manufacturing precision can be improved, but device complexity and cost increase due to elaborate in-factory calibration processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration precisionVSAvoidcalibration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The MEMS device performs self-calibration by using its own accelerometer to detect static acceleration (gravity) and automatically compute offset corrections for the magnetometer, eliminating the need for external calibration equipment and complex in-factory calibration processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters by collecting magnetometer data at multiple different orientations and using statistical processing to extract offset values, transforming the calibration from a complex manual process to an automatic parameter extraction task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If elaborate in-factory calibration is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and productivity decrease due to lengthy calibration procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor measurement accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration data is collected and processed in advance during normal device operation, and the offset corrections are pre-computed and stored for immediate application, eliminating the need for time-consuming calibration procedures at the point of use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects sensor data during normal operation and performs calibration computations in the background without interrupting device functionality, maintaining continuous useful action while achieving calibration goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If orientation-dependent calibration methods are used, then manufacturing precision improves, but ease of operation deteriorates as users must follow specific orientation procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to any device orientation by detecting the direction of gravity through the accelerometer and automatically adjusting the calibration calculations, making the calibration process independent of specific device orientations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The calibration method works universally across all device orientations and operating conditions, allowing the same calibration routine to be applied regardless of how the device is held or positioned, enhancing ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If continuous calibration is performed to maintain measurement precision, then reliability improves, but use of energy increases due to constant processing operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidcalibration processing energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs calibration computations periodically or on-demand rather than continuously, using the accelerometer to detect when the device is in a suitable static state for calibration, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining measurement reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The DOC process enhances measurement accuracy and reduces costs by eliminating the need for elaborate in-factory calibration, enabling consistent performance and low power consumption, while allowing the device to function regardless of biases and orientation.

Implementation Method 1

This static acceleration can be used for a dynamic offset calibration or dynamic offset correction or dynamic offset compensation (DOC) process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

a magnetometer can be used to collect a set of N data samples, each having X, Y, Z components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field measurement: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10324108B2Dynamic offset correction for calibration of MEMS sensor
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 PACIFIC RESEARCH GROUP PTE LTD
  • US10324108B2 patent drawing
  • US10324108B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hand-held processor system for processing data from an integrated MEMS device disposed within a hand-held computer system and method. A dynamic offset correction (DOC) process computes 3-axis accelerometer biases without needing to know the orientation of the device. Arbitrary output biases can be corrected to ensure consistent performance A system of linear equations is formed using basic observations of gravity measurements by an acceleration measuring device, conditioned upon constraints in data quality, degree of sensed motion, duration, and time separation. This system of equations is modified and solved when appropriate geometric diversity conditions are met.