MEMS Oscillating Mass Frequency Synchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Start-up transients in microelectromechanical devices, such as gyroscopes, can be prolonged due to phase lag caused by energy supply from local oscillators, which may counteract the oscillation of the microelectromechanical loop, leading to inefficient energy transfer and prolonged stabilization times.

Innovation Solution

A microelectromechanical device with a frequency detector and a forcing stage that provides energy through forcing signals synchronized with the current oscillation frequency, ensuring the phase delay remains below π/2, thereby preventing counterproductive energy transfer and shortening start-up transients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If energy is supplied by local oscillator during start-up transient, then oscillation is initiated, but phase lag increases and may counteract oscillation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestart-up transient durationVSAvoidenergy transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual oscillation frequency of the MEMS structure is continuously monitored and used to adjust the forcing frequency of the local oscillator. This closed-loop control ensures that the oscillator remains synchronized with the natural resonance frequency, preventing phase lag accumulation and ensuring continuous constructive energy transfer during start-up transient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the forcing frequency of the local oscillator to match the instantaneous oscillation frequency of the MEMS structure. Rather than using a fixed frequency, the system adapts in real-time to the changing oscillation characteristics, ensuring optimal energy transfer efficiency throughout the start-up transient period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If fixed number of pulses is used for forcing, then control is simplified, but start-up transient becomes prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanism complexityVSAvoidstabilization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from the actual oscillation frequency detection to control the duration and timing of forcing pulses. Rather than using a predetermined fixed number of pulses, the forcing continues as long as the frequency mismatch exists, automatically terminating when synchronization is achieved. This reduces stabilization time without significantly increasing control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables itself to determine when forcing should continue or stop based on the detected frequency relationship between the local oscillator and the MEMS structure. The automatic termination of forcing when phase lag exceeds the threshold reduces manual intervention and optimizes start-up time without complex external control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures rapid stabilization of the microelectromechanical device by maintaining energy synchronization with the oscillation frequency, reducing start-up transients and preventing phase lag issues, thus enhancing operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The movable mass and the stator are capacitively coupled through a plurality of respective comb-fingered and mutually facing electrodes so as to form capacitors. The movement of the movable mass with respect to the stator modifies the capacitance of the capacitors.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

by providing appropriate biasing voltages, it is possible to apply an electrostatic force to the movable mass to set it in motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

a microelectromechanical loop which vibrates with controlled frequency and amplitude

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS9829319B2Microelectromechanical device having an oscillating mass and a forcing stage, and method of controlling a microelectromechanical device
Publication Date: 2017.11.28 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US9829319B2 patent drawing
  • US9829319B2 patent drawing
  • US9829319B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microelectromechanical device includes: a body; a movable mass, elastically coupled to the body and oscillatable with respect to the body according to a degree of freedom; a frequency detector, configured to detect a current oscillation frequency of the movable mass; and a forcing stage, capacitively coupled to the movable mass and configured to provide energy to the movable mass through forcing signals having a forcing frequency equal to the current oscillation frequency detected by the frequency detector, at least in a first transient operating condition.