MEMS Inertial Sensor Support Part Segmentation for Warping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing inertial sensors using MEMS technology are susceptible to detection accuracy drops due to external stress and thermal stress-induced warping of the base substrate, particularly because the support parts are widely spaced, leading to reduced precision in acceleration detection.

Innovation Solution

The inertial sensor design includes a substrate with a fixing part and a moving element that swings about a rotation axis, supported by a support beam and a support part with a longer second part not fixed to the fixing part, which reduces the influence of substrate warping and enhances impact resistance by providing a larger contact area for absorbing impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the two support parts serving as the axes of rotation are arranged on both sides of the sensor part and are widely spaced apart from each other, then the structural stability is improved, but the susceptibility to the influence of a warp of the base substrate due to an external stress or a thermal stress increases, causing a drop in the detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The support part is divided into two distinct portions: a first part fixed to the fixing part and a second part not fixed to the fixing part. This segmentation allows the first part to provide stable support while the longer second part compensates for substrate warping, thus resolving the contradiction between structural stability and measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the support part have different properties: the first part is fixed and provides stable support, while the second part is longer and not fixed, allowing it to accommodate substrate warping. This local differentiation enables the support structure to simultaneously achieve stability and resist warping-induced errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the support part has a longer second part not fixed to the fixing part, then the impact resistance is improved by providing a larger contact area for absorbing impacts, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support part is segmented into a fixed first part and a longer non-fixed second part. This segmentation provides a larger contact area for impact absorption while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure that integrates seamlessly with the existing sensor components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support part combines both the fixed first part and the non-fixed second part into a single integrated component, merging the functions of support and impact absorption without requiring additional separate structures, thus avoiding excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves detection accuracy and impact resistance by minimizing the effect of substrate warping and allowing for miniaturization of the sensor while maintaining sensitivity and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a moving element 30 having an opening 43 and configured to swing about a rotation axis J along a Y-direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

a support beam 35 supporting the moving element 30 as the rotation axis J in the opening 43 of the moving element 30

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical support:

Implementation Method 3

a support part 32 supporting the support beam 35. The support part 32 has a first part 33 fixed to the fixing part 22, and a second part 34 formed only of a part not fixed to the fixing part 22. A length L2 in the Y-direction of the second part 34 is longer than a length L1 in the Y-direction of the first part 33

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact absorption: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS11573246B2Inertial sensor and inertial measurement unit
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11573246B2 patent drawing
  • US11573246B2 patent drawing
  • US11573246B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inertial sensor includes: a substrate; a fixing part arranged at one surface of the substrate; a moving element having an opening and configured to swing about a rotation axis along a first direction; a support beam supporting the moving element as the rotation axis in the opening of the moving element; and a support part supporting the support beam. The support part includes a first part fixed to the fixing part, and a second part formed only of a part not fixed to the fixing part. A length in the first direction of the second part is longer than a length in the first direction of the first part.