MEMS Inertial Sensor Z-Coupling for Interference Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional inertial sensors are sensitive to interference signals, particularly parallel to the main plane of extension, and lack flexibility in detecting both rotation and acceleration both parallel and perpendicular to this plane, with masses that are often too inert, leading to sensitivity to substrate bending.

Innovation Solution

A microelectromechanical system (MEMS) inertial sensor with a simple design, featuring a Z-shaped or rhombus-shaped coupling structure and central substrate connection point, utilizing spring structures and varying coupling element lengths to suppress interference modes and reduce mass inertia, allowing for robust detection of rotation and acceleration in multiple directions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional inertial sensors use multiple movable masses mechanically coupled to the substrate, then the sensor can detect acceleration and rotation, but the sensor becomes sensitive to interference signals and substrate bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidinterference signal sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor uses exactly two movable masses instead of multiple masses, segmenting the measurement function between these two masses. Each mass is coupled to the substrate via exactly one substrate connection point, creating independent measurement paths that reduce interference coupling between multiple masses while maintaining the ability to detect both acceleration and rotation through their coordinated movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the substrate connection points from the coupling structure, leaving only one substrate connection point per mass. This removal of redundant connection points directly reduces the sensor's sensitivity to substrate bending and interference signals, as the masses are no longer mechanically coupled to multiple points on the substrate that could transmit interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the sensor uses multiple substrate connection points for coupling masses, then the structure is more stable, but the sensor becomes sensitive to substrate bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidsubstrate bending sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes redundant substrate connection points, leaving exactly one substrate connection point per movable mass. This extraction of unnecessary connection points eliminates the mechanical pathways through which substrate bending could couple to the masses, thereby reducing sensitivity to substrate deformation while maintaining structural stability through the optimized single-point coupling configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If the sensor uses larger masses for detection, then the signal strength increases, but the sensor becomes more sensitive to interference signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal strengthVSAvoidinterference signal sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the local quality of the masses by using exactly two masses with specific inertial properties rather than multiple larger masses. The single substrate connection point per mass creates a localized coupling that maintains sufficient signal strength from the mass movement while minimizing the overall inertial mass that would be sensitive to interference signals, achieving an optimal local mass configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The sensor effectively suppresses interference signals and is insensitive to substrate bending, enabling flexible detection of both rotation and acceleration parallel and perpendicular to the main plane of extension with reduced mass inertia, resulting in improved signal quality and robustness.

Implementation Method 1

The coupling takes place particularly preferably via spring structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11016112B2Inertial sensor for measuring a rate of rotation and/or acceleration
Publication Date: 2021.05.25 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11016112B2 patent drawing
  • US11016112B2 patent drawing
  • US11016112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microelectromechanical inertial sensor to measure a rate of rotation and/or acceleration, the inertial sensor having a substrate, at least two deflectable masses coupled mechanically to the substrate, and at least one detector detecting movements of the masses along a first direction, the masses being mechanically coupled to one another by at least one first, second, and third coupling element, the coupling elements being configured so that when there is a deflection of the masses from the rest position a pivoting of a first main direction of extension of the first coupling element relative to a second main direction of extension of the second coupling element takes place and a pivoting of the second main direction of extension relative to the third main direction of extension of the third coupling element takes place, and the coupling elements being coupled mechanically to the substrate via at least one substrate connecting point.