MEMS Microphone Light-Sensor Feedback for Interference Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MEMS microphones are susceptible to light interference, which can generate electrical signals that interfere with acoustic signals, leading to false commands or security breaches, especially in environments with varying light conditions or targeted light sources.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a light sensor into the MEMS microphone package to detect and process light signals, allowing the processing circuitry to modify the microphone signal and compensate for light-induced noise, thereby enhancing signal accuracy and security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a MEMS microphone uses a partially exposed access port to receive acoustic signals, then it can capture voice commands effectively, but it becomes susceptible to light interference that generates false electrical signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic signal capture accuracyVSAvoidlight interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A light sensor is introduced as an intermediary component to detect light conditions and provide information to the processing circuitry. This intermediary allows the system to identify when light interference is present and take appropriate compensation actions, resolving the contradiction between maintaining acoustic signal capture and preventing light-induced false signals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The light sensor provides feedback about light conditions to the processing circuitry, which then modifies the microphone signal accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables real-time compensation for light interference while preserving accurate acoustic signal capture, directly addressing the technical contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the microphone process light energy as electrical signals, then it can detect the light, but it creates interference with the acoustic signal representation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight detection capabilityVSAvoidacoustic signal accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The light sensor provides feedback about detected light energy to the processing circuitry, which uses this information to compensate for and remove light-induced interference from the acoustic signal, allowing both light detection and accurate acoustic signal representation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The light sensor converts the harmful light interference into useful information that can be used to compensate for and eliminate the interference. By detecting the light signal and using it to modify the microphone output, the system transforms the harmful effect into a beneficial correction mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If targeted light sources such as lasers are used, then they can simulate acoustic signals, but they enable hacking attempts and false command generation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight signal detectionVSAvoidsecurity against hacking
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The light sensor provides feedback about targeted light sources to the processing circuitry, which identifies patterns characteristic of hacking attempts and blocks or flags them, preventing false command generation while maintaining legitimate light detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and analysis of light signals to identify potential hacking attempts before they can execute false commands. By detecting and compensating for targeted light sources in advance, the system prevents security breaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces light-induced noise and prevents false commands, improving the reliability and security of voice-controlled devices by synchronizing and filtering light signals with acoustic signals, ensuring accurate voice command recognition and preventing potential hacking attempts.

Implementation Method 1

a light sensor at a location on an exposed surface of the MEMS microphone package and configured to output a light signal based on light received at the location

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a MEMS diaphragm movable in response to a received acoustic signal, and a capacitor including the MEMS diaphragm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive sensing: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS11743667B2Discrimination of light interference in a MEMS microphone
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 INVENSENSE INC
  • US11743667B2 patent drawing
  • US11743667B2 patent drawing
  • US11743667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microelectromechanical system (MEMS) microphone includes a cavity to receive an acoustic signal. The acoustic signal causes movement of a diaphragm relative to one or more other surfaces, which in turn results in an electrical signal representative of the received acoustic signal. A light sensor is included within the packaging of the MEMS microphone such that an output of the light sensor is representative of a light signal received with the acoustic signal. The output of the light sensor is used to modify the electrical signal representative of the received acoustic signal in a manner that limits light interference with an acoustical output signal.