MEMS Mirror Beam Structure for Wide-Angle Distance Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MEMS devices for distance measurement have limitations in widening the range and improving the accuracy of distance measurement.

Innovation Solution

A MEMS device is designed with a mirror, an actuator, and a complex beam structure that includes a ring-shaped beam and snake beams, allowing for increased path length and number of bends, thereby enhancing the optical deflection angle and measurement range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a simple beam structure is used, then the device complexity is low, but the optical deflection angle and measurement range are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical deflection angleVSAvoidbeam structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The beam structure is divided into multiple segments (first beam, ring-shaped beam, second beam, third beam) that can independently deform and contribute to the optical deflection. This segmentation allows each beam to be optimized for specific functions while collectively achieving large deflection angles without requiring a monolithic complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ring-shaped beam introduces a dimensional element that connects the first and second beams in a non-linear configuration. This dimensional addition enables the structure to achieve greater optical deflection by utilizing multiple deformation modes across different spatial dimensions, transforming the simple linear beam path into a multi-dimensional deformable structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Length of moving object

If the path length and number of bends are increased, then the measurement range is widened, but the mechanical interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath lengthVSAvoidmechanical interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Different portions of the beam structure have different structural qualities optimized for their specific functions. The first beam is optimized for horizontal rotation with specific flexibility, the ring-shaped beam provides structural support and dimensional connectivity, the second beam handles vertical rotation, and the third beam (snake beam) provides extended path length with controlled bends. This local optimization allows long path lengths without uniform mechanical interference throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The beam structure is designed to be dynamically flexible rather than rigid, allowing each beam segment to deform independently during operation. This dynamic characteristic enables the long path length to adapt to mechanical stresses and interference forces, maintaining measurement accuracy by absorbing disturbances through controlled deformation rather than transmitting them rigidly across the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If a complex beam structure with snake beams is used, then the measurement accuracy is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance measurement accuracyVSAvoidbeam structure fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The complex beam structure is segmented into four distinct beam types (first beam, ring-shaped beam, second beam, third beam), each with standardized connection interfaces. This segmentation allows each beam to be manufactured separately using optimized processes for its specific geometry, then assembled through standardized connections, reducing overall manufacturing complexity compared to fabricating a single monolithic complex structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The four separate beams are merged through standardized connection points to form the complete measurement structure. This merging approach allows the complex functionality to be achieved by combining simpler, standardized components rather than manufacturing one highly complex integrated structure, thereby improving ease of manufacture while maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The enhanced beam structure increases the optical deflection angle, allowing for a wider range of distance measurement and improved accuracy, while also suppressing mechanical interference and maintaining stability in resonant operation.

Implementation Method 1

both ends of the third beam are connected to the actuator individually

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

a mirror

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

a path length L from the first connection part to the second connection part and from the first connection part to the third connection part along the third beam is greater than L0

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20250123369A1MEMS device and distance measuring apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 LINFINEL LLC
  • US20250123369A1 patent drawing
  • US20250123369A1 patent drawing
  • US20250123369A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The accuracy of distance measurement is improved, for example.The MEMS device includes a mirror, an actuator, a first beam extending in a direction of a horizontal rotation axis and connected to the mirror, a ring-shaped beam connected to the first beam, a second beam extending in a direction of a vertical rotation axis and connected to the ring-shaped beam, and a third beam having a first connection part positioned substantially in the middle thereof, the third beam further having a second connection part and a third connection part positioned at both ends thereof, the third beam being connected to the second beam via the first connection part. Both ends of the third beam are connected to the actuator individually via the second connection part and the third connection part. In a case where L0 denotes a minimum distance from the first connection part to the second connection part and from the first connection part to the third connection part as connected by a line substantially parallel to the horizontal rotation axis and by a line substantially parallel to the vertical rotation axis, and where N0 represents the number of bends of approximately 90 degrees each, a path length L from the first connection part to the second connection part and from the first connection part to the third connection part along the third beam is greater than L0, and the number of bends N is larger than N0.