MEMS Mirror Failure Detection Circuit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MEMS mirrors in devices like wafer defect scanners and projectors can fail unexpectedly, causing a high-power laser beam to shine in a fixed direction, leading to potential surface damage, and existing technologies are inadequate for rapid failure detection.

Innovation Solution

A circuit with a mirror position sensor generating an analog output, an analog-to-digital converter, and failure detection circuitry that calculates the difference between digital mirror sense signals at different instants to determine if the difference exceeds a threshold, allowing for quick detection of mirror failure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a MEMS mirror fails and the rotor becomes stuck, then the laser beam shines in a fixed direction, but damage occurs to surfaces in a very short period of time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidsurface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit continuously monitors the mirror position sensor output and calculates velocity in real-time during normal operation, preparing the failure detection mechanism beforehand. When the mirror becomes stuck, the pre-established monitoring system immediately detects the zero velocity condition and triggers laser shutdown, preventing surface damage without requiring additional reaction time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by monitoring the mirror position sensor output and calculating velocity at each instant. The failure detection circuitry compares the calculated velocity against a threshold, and when the mirror becomes stuck (zero velocity), the feedback loop immediately triggers laser beam shutdown, creating a closed-loop safety mechanism that prevents surface damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If existing failure detection technologies are used, then detection can be performed, but the response time is too slow to prevent damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection capabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical or slow electronic failure detection methods with an optical-based sensor system that continuously monitors mirror position and calculates velocity electronically. This substitution enables real-time detection at the speed of electronic signal processing, reducing response time from potentially seconds to microseconds, thereby preventing surface damage before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameter from monitoring mirror position alone to calculating mirror velocity by comparing position at different instants. This parameter transformation enables the system to detect stuck conditions (zero velocity) immediately, as the velocity calculation reveals the failure state within a single oscillation period, dramatically reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the laser beam is continuously monitored, then failure can be detected, but the complexity of the monitoring system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mirror position sensor serves multiple functions: it provides position information for normal laser scanning operation and simultaneously provides the data needed for failure detection through velocity calculation. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate failure detection sensors, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own operational parameters (mirror position sensor output) to detect failures, rather than requiring external monitoring equipment. The velocity calculation is performed using the same sensor that drives the scanning operation, allowing the system to self-monitor and self-diagnose failures without adding external complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid detection of MEMS mirror failure within a single period of oscillation, preventing damage by quickly switching off the laser beam, thus ensuring safety and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

a mirror position sensor associated with the movable MEMS mirror and that generates an analog output as a function of angular position of the movable MEMS mirror

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPosition sensing:

Implementation Method 2

An analog to digital converter converts the analog output from the mirror position sensor to a digital mirror sense signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnalog to digital conversion:

Data Source

PatentUS10048488B2Circuit for detection of failure of movable MEMS mirror
Publication Date: 2018.08.14 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US10048488B2 patent drawing
  • US10048488B2 patent drawing
  • US10048488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a circuit for determining failure of a movable MEMS mirror. The circuit includes a mirror position sensor associated with the movable MEMS mirror and that generates an analog output as a function of angular position of the movable MEMS mirror. An analog to digital converter converts the analog output from the mirror position sensor to a digital mirror sense signal. Failure detection circuitry calculates a difference between the digital mirror sense signal at a first instant in time and the digital mirror sense signal at a second instant in time, determines whether the difference exceeds a threshold, and indicates failure of the movable MEMS mirror as a function of the difference failing to exceed the threshold.