MEMS Mirror Flexure Connector Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MEMS mirror assemblies face challenges in scaling to smaller dimensions due to increased hinge spring forces per mirror area, leading to higher external forces required for movement, which results in stress, strain, reduced control, and micromirror distortion.

Innovation Solution

The optical element assembly features a unique connector assembly with flexure assemblies that allow for kinematic coupling of optical elements to a base, enabling precise movement with reduced distortion and stiction, and scalable design, using a double flexure arrangement to balance electrical and mechanical forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If MEMS mirror assemblies are scaled to smaller dimensions, then device size is reduced, but hinge spring forces per mirror area increase leading to higher external forces required for movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidexternal forces required for movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The mirror assembly is divided into multiple independently controllable micromirrors, each with its own support structure. This segmentation allows each micromirror to be moved with reduced force compared to moving a single large mirror, as the hinge spring forces are distributed across multiple smaller units rather than concentrated in one large structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs flexible support structures and thin film materials in the hinge and suspension mechanisms. These flexible elements reduce the stiffness of the connection between micromirrors and the substrate, thereby reducing the hinge spring forces that oppose mirror movement. The flexible films allow for easier actuation while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Ease of operation

If higher external forces are applied to move scaled-down mirrors, then movement is achieved, but stress and strain increase leading to reduced control and micromirror distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement controlVSAvoidmicromirror structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the physical parameters of the micromirrors and their support structures, including thickness, material composition, and geometric configuration. By carefully selecting these parameters, the design achieves a balance where the mirrors are sufficiently lightweight and compliant for easy actuation, yet maintain adequate structural strength to prevent distortion under applied forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The support structures are designed to provide counterbalancing forces that offset the hinge spring forces during mirror actuation. This counterweight effect reduces the net external force required to move the mirrors, thereby minimizing stress and strain on the micromirror structures while maintaining precise control over their movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Device complexity

If traditional connection methods are used for optical elements, then structural simplicity is maintained, but distortion and stiction increase during movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector assembly structureVSAvoidoptical element positioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The connector assembly incorporates flexible film elements that allow the optical elements to move smoothly without excessive friction or stiction. These flexible films provide a low-friction interface between moving and stationary components, enabling precise positioning while reducing the forces required for actuation and minimizing distortion during movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The connector assembly introduces intermediary flexible elements between the optical elements and the rigid support structure. These intermediaries act as mediators that decouple the rigid constraints from the moving optical elements, allowing for smooth, low-friction movement while maintaining precise positional control and reducing distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for precise control of optical element position with reduced stress and distortion, enabling efficient beam shaping and steering while maintaining scalability and minimizing stiction, thus overcoming the limitations of traditional MEMS mirror assemblies.

Implementation Method 1

a first flexure assembly having an element flexure and a base flexure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10254654B2Microelectromechanical mirror assembly
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 NIKON CORP
  • US10254654B2 patent drawing
  • US10254654B2 patent drawing
  • US10254654B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An optical element assembly includes a base, and an element unit. The element unit includes (i) an optical element having an element central axis and an element perimeter; and (ii) an element connector assembly that couples the optical element to the base, the element connector assembly including a flexure assembly having an element flexure and a base flexure. A distal end of the element flexure is coupled to the optical element near the element perimeter, a distal end of the base flexure is coupled to the base, and a proximal end of the element flexure is coupled to a proximal end of the base flexure near the element central axis.