MEMS Mirror Device Single Substrate Integration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional MEMS mirror devices require multiple substrates and complex etching processes, leading to increased size and etching gas exposure, which complicates the manufacturing process and reduces efficiency.
Innovation Solution
A MEMS mirror device with a semiconductor substrate featuring a first cavity with an open bottom and a second cavity with a closed bottom, where a comb-teeth-like fixed electrode and movable electrode are formed to mesh with each other, allowing for reduced etching gas exposure and simplified manufacturing by processing the substrate to form all components, including a swing portion and beam, in a single semiconductor substrate.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If multiple substrates are used to form the MEMS mirror device components, then the structural integrity and functionality are improved, but the device size and manufacturing complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges multiple substrates into a single semiconductor substrate, integrating the mirror support structure, comb electrodes, and cavity formation all within one substrate. This eliminates the need for multiple separate substrates while maintaining structural integrity through unified material properties and simplified interfacial connections.
Solution Approach 2:
The single semiconductor substrate serves multiple functions: supporting the mirror structure, forming the comb electrodes, creating the cavities, and providing the mechanical foundation for the entire MEMS device. This multi-functional integration reduces the number of components and simplifies the overall device architecture.
2Volume of moving object
If complex etching processes are used to form all components in a single substrate, then the device size is reduced, but the etching gas exposure and manufacturing burden increase
Solution Approach 1:
The etching process is segmented into multiple stages with different etching gases and parameters. Different regions of the substrate receive tailored etching treatments: isotropic etching for cavity formation, anisotropic etching for electrode patterning, and selective etching for releasing the mirror structure. This segmentation allows efficient formation of complex 3D structures while managing gas exposure.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs parameter changes in the etching process by varying gas composition, pressure, temperature, and power across different etching steps. This enables precise control over etch rate, selectivity, and anisotropy to create the required complex structures within a single substrate without excessive gas exposure.
3Ease of operation
If the first cavity is formed deeply to enable mirror swing movement, then the mirror swing range is improved, but the etching gas impingement on the support table increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent transitions from purely vertical cavity etching to a combination of vertical and lateral etching approaches. By forming the cavity with controlled depth and using lateral release structures, the mirror achieves sufficient swing range while limiting the vertical etch depth that would cause excessive gas impingement on the support table.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces intermediate structures such as release holes and sacrificial layers that mediate between the deep cavity requirement and the gas impingement constraint. These intermediaries allow the etching process to proceed to the required depth while controlling gas flow and pressure to minimize support table exposure.
4Adaptability or versatility
If conventional multi-substrate assembly is used, then component functionality is achieved, but the number of manufacturing steps and time increase
Solution Approach 1:
Multiple functional components that would traditionally require separate substrates are merged into a single semiconductor substrate, including the mirror support beam, comb electrodes, and cavity structures. This integration eliminates multiple assembly steps, alignment operations, and bonding processes, dramatically improving manufacturing efficiency.
Solution Approach 2:
All structural components and electrodes are preliminarily formed within the single substrate before final assembly. The comb electrodes, cavity structures, and support beams are all created in advance during the substrate processing stage, eliminating the need for post-assembly operations and reducing total manufacturing time.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach enables the production of a smaller-sized MEMS mirror device with reduced etching burden on the apparatus and fewer manufacturing steps, while maintaining effective operation by allowing the mirror to swing and resonate efficiently.
Implementation Method 1
an electrostatically-driven MEMS mirror device for performing laser light switching or laser light scanning
Data Source
AI summary
A MEMS mirror device includes a semiconductor substrate, a mirror provided on the semiconductor substrate, a first cavity, a second cavity, and a frame portion to define the first cavity and the second cavity. The semiconductor substrate further includes a swing portion formed just above the first cavity to support the mirror, a straight beam provided just above the first cavity to extend between the frame portion and the swing portion, a comb-teeth-like fixed electrode, and a comb-teeth-like movable electrode, the movable electrode meshing with the fixed electrode with a gap left therebetween, the swing portion configured to swing about the beam as a swing axis in response to movement of the movable electrode.


