MEMS Oscillator Arrays for Unclonable Frequency Fingerprints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for unique identifiers that are easy to manufacture but difficult to copy, especially in the context of counterfeiting, which poses significant economic and security risks across various applications.

Innovation Solution

The method involves fabricating a plurality of oscillators, adhering a weight to at least one of them, and recognizing the frequency response as a unique identifier, using techniques such as dewetting or dealloying, and optically reading the frequency response to create a unique identifier that is challenging to replicate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional unique identifier methods (e.g., serial numbers, barcodes) are used, then manufacturing is simple and成本低, but they are easy to copy and provide low security against counterfeiting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthenticity verificationVSAvoididentifier structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses mechanical vibration by fabricating multiple micro-oscillators with different natural frequencies. Each oscillator is designed with specific dimensions (length, width, thickness) that determine its resonant frequency. When stimulated, these oscillators vibrate at their characteristic frequencies, creating a unique frequency spectrum that serves as the device's identifier. This mechanical vibration approach provides high security against counterfeiting while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standard MEMS fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

2Reliability

If complex unique identifier systems are implemented to prevent counterfeiting, then security improves, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterfeit preventionVSAvoidfabrication process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs self-service by allowing the physical unclonable function to generate its own unique identifier automatically during the manufacturing process. The inherent variations in oscillator frequencies arise naturally from normal manufacturing tolerances and material property variations, without requiring additional complex fabrication steps. The device itself produces its unique fingerprint through the natural physical properties of its oscillators, eliminating the need for external programming or complex assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by exploiting variations in the physical parameters of the oscillators (dimensions, material properties, mass distribution) that occur during normal manufacturing. These parameter variations, which would traditionally be considered defects, are actually leveraged to create unique frequency signatures. The oscillators are designed with parameters such as length, width, and thickness that naturally vary within tolerance ranges, and these variations directly translate to unique resonant frequencies that form the device's unclonable identifier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If multiple oscillators with varying dimensions are fabricated to create unique frequency responses, then identifier uniqueness improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency response uniquenessVSAvoidoscillator dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies blessing in disguise by converting the harmful effect of manufacturing variations into a beneficial feature. Instead of trying to eliminate dimensional tolerances and material property variations through tighter process control, the invention embraces these variations as the source of unique frequency signatures. The natural spread in oscillator frequencies caused by normal manufacturing tolerances creates the uniqueness required for secure identification, turning what would normally be a problem into the core advantage of the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach generates a unique identifier that is difficult to copy, providing a high level of authenticity verification, effectively preventing counterfeiting and ensuring the integrity of products across various applications.

Implementation Method 1

Each oscillator in the array has a different natural frequency, and when stimulated, they vibrate at their respective natural frequencies to generate a frequency response

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNatural frequency vibration: Resonance

Implementation Method 2

When stimulated, they vibrate at their respective natural frequencies to generate a frequency response that is difficult to replicate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExternal stimulation: Driven Harmonic Oscillation

Data Source

PatentUS20230143362A1Microelectromechanical oscillators producing unique identifiers
Publication Date: 2023.05.11 ALLIANCE FOR ENERGY INNOVATION LLC
  • US20230143362A1 patent drawing
  • US20230143362A1 patent drawing
  • US20230143362A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is using an array of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) oscillators to produce unique identifiers. At least some of the MEMS oscillators will “couple” or influence each other when exposed to an external stimulus, such that the frequency of the device is not equal to the combination of individual MEMS oscillator frequencies. The frequency of the device provides a unique “fingerprint” that allows the device to be identified with accuracy but is incredibly difficult to copy, meaning the response may be a physical unclonable function (PUF).