MEMS Particle Sorting With Camera Confirmation and Deep Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluorescence-activated cell sorting systems (FACS) are large, expensive, and require substantial training, leading to limited accessibility and inefficiencies in sorting sub-populations, while MEMS-based systems face challenges in real-time optimization and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A microfabricated particle manipulation system with multiple laser interrogation regions and optical confirmation using a camera/classifier, employing deep learning algorithms for real-time optimization and enhanced accuracy in sorting or manipulating particles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fluorescence-activated cell sorting systems (FACS) are used for particle sorting, then sorting capability is achieved, but system size and cost increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capabilityVSAvoidsystem size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the particle sorting function into separate modular components: a microfabricated particle manipulation device with multiple discrete manipulation stages, each performing specific functions (deflection, sorting, manipulation). This segmentation allows the system to achieve complex sorting capabilities while maintaining a compact overall structure, avoiding the need for large integrated FACS systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex optical-mechanical FACS system with a microfabricated device that uses controlled fluid flow and electromagnetic fields for particle manipulation. The microfabricated device uses pressure-driven flow and electrostatic or magnetic actuation instead of large optical systems, lasers, and mechanical sorting mechanisms, thereby reducing system size while maintaining sorting functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If fluorescence-activated cell sorting systems (FACS) are used for particle sorting, then sorting capability is achieved, but system cost and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capabilityVSAvoidtraining requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The microfabricated particle manipulation device is designed with automated control systems that manage the complex sorting operations without requiring extensive user training. The device integrates control electronics and software that automatically regulate fluid flow, particle detection, and manipulation stage actuation, making the system easier to operate compared to traditional FACS systems that require specialized training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If MEMS-based particle manipulation systems are used, then system size is reduced, but real-time optimization capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem sizeVSAvoidreal-time optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms in the microfabricated particle manipulation device, where detectors monitor particle properties in real-time and the control system adjusts manipulation parameters accordingly. This feedback loop enables real-time optimization of sorting parameters, allowing the compact MEMS-based system to adapt to varying particle characteristics and optimize performance dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The microfabricated device employs dynamically adjustable parameters including variable fluid flow rates, adjustable electromagnetic field strengths, and movable manipulation stages that can be repositioned in real-time. This dynamic capability allows the system to adapt to different particle types and sorting requirements, providing versatility comparable to larger systems while maintaining compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple manipulation stages are used in microfabricated devices, then manipulation precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple manipulation functions into a single integrated microfabricated device structure. The multiple manipulation stages are fabricated together on the same substrate using microfabrication techniques, sharing common fluid channels, support structures, and control systems. This merging approach maintains high manipulation precision through multi-stage processing while avoiding the complexity of assembling separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The microfabricated device is designed with universal components that perform multiple functions: the same substrate and fluid channels support all manipulation stages, the same control electronics regulate all actuation mechanisms, and the same detector system monitors particles throughout the manipulation process. This multi-functionality reduces overall device complexity while enabling precise multi-stage particle manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time adjustment of sorting parameters, improves accuracy and efficiency, and reduces the need for extensive training, making MEMS-based systems more accessible and effective for smaller entities.

Implementation Method 1

This signal may be a photon from a fluorescent tag which is affixed to the target particle and excited by laser illumination in an interrogation region upstream of the MEMS device.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Implementation Method 2

The actuation means for the moveable switch may be thermal, piezoelectric, electrostatic, or magnetic, for example.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

The actuation means for the moveable switch may be thermal, piezoelectric, electrostatic, or magnetic, for example.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS12553815B2Particle manipulation system with camera/classifier confirmation and deep learning algorithm
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 OWL BIOMEDICAL INC
  • US12553815B2 patent drawing
  • US12553815B2 patent drawing
  • US12553815B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A MEMS-based particle manipulation system which uses a particle manipulation stage and optical confirmation of the manipulation. The optical confirmation may be camera-based, and may be used to assess the effectiveness or accuracy of the particle manipulation stage. In one exemplary embodiment, the particle manipulation stage is a microfabricated, fluid valve, which sorts a target particle from non-target particles in a fluid stream. The optical confirmation stage is disposed in the microfabricated fluid channels at the input and output of the microfabricated sorting valve. Deep learning techniques are brought to bear on the camera output to increase speed, accuracy and reliability.