Microelectromechanical Pressure Sensor Testing via Reference Curve Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing microelectromechanical semiconductor components, particularly pressure sensors, are complex and require significant equipment modifications, limiting pressure range and setup versatility, and often necessitate additional hardware like force sensors for calibration.

Innovation Solution

A method using a structurally identical reference pressure sensor and a distance-controlled deflection plunger to determine the critical pressure at which the measuring element breaks, allowing for comparison with the tested sensor's deformation characteristics to assess its ability to withstand higher pressures without breaking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a force sensor is used to mechanically act upon the pressure-sensitive measuring element with predeterminable force, then the measurement precision is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional hardware costs and calibration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical force sensor system with an electrical voltage source system. Instead of using a force sensor to apply mechanical force, the invention uses a voltage source to generate a test voltage that is applied to the measuring element, thereby substituting a mechanical measurement system with an electrical one that is simpler and more precise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a reference pressure sensor with known characteristics to create a reference curve that serves as a template for evaluating test pressure sensors. By copying the structural design and using it to establish reference data, the system eliminates the need for complex force measurement while maintaining measurement precision through comparison with the reference curve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If the wafer prober test assembly is substantially modified with additional equipment, then the measurement capability is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to complex test setups

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement capabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the wafer prober test assembly universal by enabling it to test both integrated circuits and microelectromechanical semiconductor components using the same basic equipment. The test method can be applied to different component types without substantial modification, allowing one test assembly to serve multiple functions and simplifying operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical pressure application systems with a simple voltage-based testing system. By substituting mechanical force sensors and pressure application mechanisms with electrical voltage sources and evaluation circuits, the system becomes easier to operate while maintaining enhanced measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If different test setups are used for various thicknesses of pressure-sensitive measuring elements, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal test method that can evaluate pressure sensors with different measuring element thicknesses using the same test setup. By applying voltage to the measuring element and evaluating the electrical characteristics, the system can assess manufacturing precision across various thicknesses without requiring different mechanical test configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces thickness-specific mechanical test setups with a universal electrical testing system. Instead of using different mechanical pressure application methods for different thicknesses, the invention uses voltage application and electrical signal evaluation that works across various thicknesses, thereby maintaining manufacturing precision assessment while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Strength

If the critical pressure is determined by mechanically acting with predeterminable force until breakage, then the strength measurement is improved, but the loss of time increases due to calibration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength measurementVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming mechanical force application and calibration with rapid electrical voltage testing. By applying voltage to the measuring element and evaluating electrical signals, the system determines strength characteristics without the time loss associated with mechanical sensor calibration and force application procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a reference pressure sensor to create a reference curve that can be reused for multiple measurements. By copying the reference characteristics and using them for comparison, the system eliminates repeated calibration time while maintaining accurate strength measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the testing process, eliminates the need for additional sensors, and enables the evaluation of pressure sensors' linearity, sensitivity, and mechanical integrity, allowing for the qualification of microelectromechanical semiconductor components across various thicknesses and pressure ranges.

Implementation Method 1

a deflection plunger (32) which can be advanced in a distance-controlled manner... the deflection plunger is brought into contact with the measuring element (18) and is subsequently advanced in a distance-controlled manner with reversible deformation of the measuring element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the circuit elements comprise such elements which detect the mechanical stresses occurring during deformation of the measuring elements. These circuit elements are pressure-sensitive transistors or resistors, for example, which are integrated in the measuring element and are arranged in a bridge circuit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Data Source

PatentUS9322731B2Method for measuring a microelectromechanical semiconductor component
Publication Date: 2016.04.26 MEASUREMENT SPECIALTIES INC
  • US9322731B2 patent drawing
  • US9322731B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are directed to checking a pressure sensor comprising a reversibly deformable, in particular reversibly bendable measuring element which supplies a measurement signal having a value depending on the degree of deformation of said measuring element, to the effect of whether the pressure sensor withstands a required maximum pressure which is larger by a predeterminable factor than a nominal pressure for which the sensor is designed. The methods generally involve use of a reference pressure sensor, which is structurally identical to the pressure sensor to be checked, for generating a distance/pressure characteristic curve and for evaluating the critical pressure required for breaking the measuring element. The critical pressure can then be used to determine if a particular value of pressure is larger than the required maximum pressure that the pressure sensor to be checked is intended to withstand.