MEMS Acoustic Resonator Functionalization for Higher Analyte Sensitivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing MEMS resonator-based biosensors face challenges in achieving high sensitivity for detecting analytes at low concentrations due to non-uniform sensitivity distribution over the sensor surface and excess functionalization material leading to undesirable analyte binding.

Innovation Solution

A MEMS resonator device with functionalization material applied only over the central portion of the active region, optimizing its dimensions and configuration to enhance sensitivity, and directing the analyte flow to interact primarily with the most sensitive areas, thereby preventing binding in less sensitive regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If functionalization material is applied over the entire active region, then the binding capacity is increased, but the sensitivity is reduced due to non-uniform sensitivity distribution and binding in less sensitive regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding capacityVSAvoiddetection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies functionalization material selectively only to the central portion of the active region where sensitivity is highest, rather than uniformly across the entire surface. This creates a non-uniform distribution of binding sites that matches the non-uniform sensitivity profile, concentrating binding capacity in the most sensitive area while avoiding binding in less sensitive peripheral regions, thus resolving the contradiction between total binding capacity and detection sensitivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If functionalization material is applied over the entire active region, then more binding sites are available, but false positives increase due to binding in less sensitive regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of binding sitesVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By restricting functionalization material to the central high-sensitivity region, the patent ensures that binding events occur predominantly where the sensor response is most reliable. This localized approach reduces spurious binding in peripheral low-sensitivity areas, thereby decreasing false positives while maintaining sufficient binding sites in the optimized central region

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If functionalization material is applied over the entire active region, then the coverage is maximized, but the signal change from small mass adsorption is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctionalization coverage areaVSAvoidsignal change magnitude
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the functionalization coverage area by confining it to the central portion of the active region where sensitivity is maximized. This concentrated coverage in the high-sensitivity zone produces larger signal changes for a given mass adsorption compared to diffuse coverage across the entire area, as the binding events occur where the acoustic wave interaction is strongest

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than applying functionalization material over the entire active region (excessive action), the patent applies it only to the necessary central portion (partial action) where it provides the greatest benefit. This partial coverage strategy achieves optimal signal response without the diminishing returns and negative effects of full-surface coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases the signal change from small mass adsorption, improving the detection sensitivity and reducing false positives by focusing analyte binding on the most sensitive areas of the sensor.

Implementation Method 1

a bulk acoustic wave resonator structure including a piezoelectric material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

at least one functionalization material arranged over at least a central portion of a top side electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11695384B2Acoustic resonator device with controlled placement of functionalization material
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 QORVO US INC
  • US11695384B2 patent drawing
  • US11695384B2 patent drawing
  • US11695384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micro-electrical-mechanical system (MEMS) resonator device includes at least one functionalization material arranged over at least a central portion, but less than an entirety, of a top side electrode. For an active region exhibiting greatest sensitivity at a center point and reduced sensitivity along its periphery, omitting functionalization material over at least one peripheral portion of a resonator active region prevents analyte binding in regions of lowest sensitivity. The at least one functionalization material extends a maximum length in a range of from about 20% to about 95% of an active area length and extends a maximum width in a range of from about 50% to 100% of an active area width. Methods for fabricating MEMS resonator devices are also provided.