MEMS Movable Element Roughness for Anti-Stiction Layer Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices, such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, face stiction issues due to the minimal surface area contact between flat surfaces, leading to poor anti-stiction layer quality and reduced sensitivity and lifespan.

Innovation Solution

Introducing roughness on the movable element's surface within the MEMS package, which increases the surface area for the anti-stiction layer formation, thereby enhancing the layer's quality and reducing stiction, without additional masks or affecting bond interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If flat surfaces are used for the movable element, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the anti-stiction layer quality is poor due to minimal surface area contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-stiction layer qualityVSAvoidsurface structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a flat two-dimensional surface to a rough three-dimensional surface structure. The rough surface includes peaks and valleys that increase the effective surface area by a factor of 2-10 times, providing better contact area for the anti-stiction layer formation while maintaining the same planar footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The rough surface structure is applied locally to the movable element's contact surfaces where anti-stiction is most critical. The roughness is created through selective processes that affect only the surfaces requiring enhanced anti-stiction properties, while other areas remain relatively smooth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If roughness is introduced on the movable element surface, then the surface area for anti-stiction layer formation increases, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-stiction layer uniformityVSAvoidsurface processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rough surface is formed during the manufacturing process before the anti-stiction layer deposition. By pre-creating the rough surface structure through processes like chemical mechanical polishing or etching, the subsequent anti-stiction layer formation benefits from increased surface area without requiring additional complex processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the surface topology parameter from flat to rough, which fundamentally alters the surface area available for anti-stiction layer formation. This parameter change is achieved through controlled manufacturing processes that create peaks and valleys, increasing the effective contact area by 2-10 times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If flat surfaces are used, then the device structure is simple, but stiction occurs more easily reducing device lifespan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice lifespanVSAvoidsurface structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces surface roughness that creates peaks and valleys, increasing the effective surface area by 2-10 times. This dimensional change from flat to rough surface provides better mechanical interlocking and increased contact area for the anti-stiction layer, preventing stiction and extending device lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of increased surface complexity into a benefit by using the rough surface structure to enhance anti-stiction properties. The peaks and valleys, while increasing structural complexity, create better mechanical interlocking and increased contact area that prevents stiction, thereby extending device lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The roughness minimizes stiction and improves the uniformity and quality of the anti-stiction layer, extending the lifespan and sensitivity of MEMS devices.

Implementation Method 1

Introducing roughness on the movable element's surface within the MEMS package, which increases the surface area for the anti-stiction layer formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS11192775B2Rough layer for better anti-stiction deposition
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11192775B2 patent drawing
  • US11192775B2 patent drawing
  • US11192775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) package with roughness for high quality anti-stiction is provided. A device substrate is arranged over a support device. The device substrate comprises a movable element with a lower surface that is rough and that is arranged within a cavity. A dielectric layer is arranged between the support device and the device substrate. The dielectric layer laterally encloses the cavity. An anti-stiction layer lines the lower surface of the movable element. A method for manufacturing the MEMS package is also provided.