MEMS Scanning Display Resolution via Segmented Laser Interlacing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current MEMS scanning display technology is limited by upper bounds on mirror scan rates, which restricts display resolution, particularly in near-eye applications, and increasing scan rates leads to increased power consumption and diffraction issues, making it difficult to achieve higher resolutions without compromising image quality.

Innovation Solution

The use of an interlaced mode with multiple lasers and variable scan rates, combined with phase offsets between interlaced frames, allows for higher resolution output without increasing mirror scan frequencies, enabling larger mirrors and optimizing image pixel spacing and resolution based on user gaze direction through eye-tracking sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If mirror scan rate is increased to achieve higher display resolution, then display resolution is improved, but power consumption increases and diffraction issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay resolutionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the scanning display system into multiple independent laser sources, each scanning a portion of the display area. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high overall resolution without requiring any single mirror to scan at excessively high rates, thereby reducing power consumption and diffraction effects while maintaining high display resolution through the combined output of multiple lasers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If mirror scan rate is increased to achieve higher display resolution, then display resolution is improved, but diffraction issues worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay resolutionVSAvoiddiffraction issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the display area and using multiple laser sources, the patent reduces the scanning angle and speed requirements for individual mirrors. This segmentation approach minimizes diffraction effects that occur at high scan rates while still achieving high overall display resolution through the composite image formed by multiple lasers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-affected harmful factors

If mirror size is increased to achieve larger aperture and avoid diffraction limits, then diffraction resistance is improved, but scanning frequency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediffraction resistanceVSAvoidscanning frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs multiple smaller laser sources distributed across the display area, each with its own scanning mirror. This segmentation eliminates the need for a single large mirror, allowing the use of smaller mirrors that can scan at higher frequencies while collectively providing adequate aperture and resolving diffraction limits through their combined scanning coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple lasers with interlaced mode and phase offsets are used, then display resolution is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay resolutionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple laser scanning outputs into a single unified display image through interlaced mode operation and phase offset coordination. By combining the scanning patterns of multiple lasers in a synchronized manner, the system achieves high display resolution while managing device complexity through integrated control of the multiple laser sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves higher display resolution without the limitations of current MEMS technology, providing sharper images and reducing power consumption by dynamically adjusting laser output and scan parameters based on user gaze and motion, thereby enhancing image quality and user experience.

Implementation Method 1

laser light is reflected by a scanning mirror system at different angles to scan the laser across pixels of a projected image

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

an eye-tracking sensor is used to detect a user's gaze direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGaze detection:

Data Source

PatentEP3590000B1MEMS scanning display device
Publication Date: 2023.08.30 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP3590000B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3590000B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3590000B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Examples are disclosed that related to scanning image display systems. In one example, a scanning head-mounted display system includes a light source, a motion sensor, a scanning mirror system configured to scan light from the light source along at least one dimension to form an image, and a controller configured to control the scanning mirror system to scan the light to form the image, receive head motion data from the motion sensor, and adjust one or more of a scan rate and a phase offset between a first frame and a second frame of the image based upon the head motion data.