MEMS Sensor Cavity Segmentation for Getter Particle Sorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional MEMS rotation rate sensors face limitations in mechanical quality due to friction between residual gas and the mechanical oscillating structure, which restricts the achievable internal pressure and quality of the MEMS element, and existing methods struggle to maintain low internal pressure without affecting the sensor element.

Innovation Solution

A micromechanical component design that includes a structure between the sensor element and the getter, allowing desorbed particles to be sorbed into a separate area, thereby preventing interaction with the sensor element and enabling effective binding of residual gas molecules by the getter without compromising sensor properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If a getter is used in the cavity to reduce internal pressure, then the internal pressure is reduced and held constant, but particles desorbed by the getter may interact with and degrade the sensor element

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal pressureVSAvoidparticle interaction with sensor element
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity is segmented into a first cavity containing the sensor element and a second cavity containing the getter. This spatial segmentation prevents direct interaction between particles desorbed by the getter and the sensor element, while still allowing the getter to function in reducing internal pressure. The partition wall between the cavities enables separate functional zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A partition wall acts as an intermediary structure between the getter and the sensor element. This intermediary physically separates the getter's desorption process from the sensor element, preventing harmful particle interactions while maintaining the pressure-reducing function of the getter through the partition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the sensor wafer and cap wafer are bonded in a chamber to achieve low internal pressure, then high mechanical quality is achieved, but residual gas and outgassing from surfaces limit the achievable minimum internal pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical qualityVSAvoidinternal pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The getter provides self-service by continuously absorbing residual gas and outgassing products from the cavity surfaces. This self-service mechanism actively maintains low internal pressure without requiring external intervention, overcoming the limitations imposed by residual gas and surface outgassing that would otherwise prevent achieving ultra-low pressures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a structure is added between the sensor element and getter to prevent particle interaction, then sensor protection is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor element protectionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cavity is divided into two separate cavities using a partition wall, creating distinct functional zones. This segmentation approach protects the sensor element from particle interaction while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure. The partition wall serves multiple functions: physical separation, structural support, and cavity definition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The partition wall structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it separates the getter from the sensor element to prevent particle interaction, provides structural support for the cavity configuration, and defines the boundaries of both cavities. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional protective structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for targeted and cost-effective setting of internal pressure in MEMS components, achieving low pressures below 1 mbar while maintaining sensor quality and enabling separate pressure settings for rotation rate and acceleration sensors.

Implementation Method 1

a getter that acts particularly effectively and efficiently is thus made possible which binds residual gas molecules in the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 2

a particle that is desorbed by the getter is sorbed onto and/or into an area of the micromechanical component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDesorption: Desorption

Implementation Method 3

a particle that is desorbed by the getter is sorbed onto and/or into an area of the micromechanical component that is spaced apart from the sensor element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSorption: Sorption

Data Source

PatentUS10273146B2Micromechanical component
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US10273146B2 patent drawing
  • US10273146B2 patent drawing
  • US10273146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micromechanical component is provided, the micromechanical component enclosing a cavity, the micromechanical component including a sensor element situated in the cavity, and the micromechanical component including a getter situated in the cavity. The micromechanical component includes a structure, situated between the sensor element and the getter, which is designed in such a way that a particle that is desorbed by the getter is sorbed onto and/or into an area of the micromechanical component that is spaced apart from the sensor element.