MEMS Inertial Sensor Interface for Coupling-Free Demodulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interface techniques for MEMS inertial sensors suffer from signal coupling between actuation and detection paths, which degrades performance, and require complex phase adjustments for demodulation, often at the cost of increased power and area consumption.

Innovation Solution

The proposed ASIC interface employs self-clocking, low-jitter clocking, and advanced signal processing techniques to minimize signal coupling, maximize dynamic range, and achieve fine phase tuning between sense and drive loops, using a hybrid electromechanical ΣΔ modulator with continuous-time and discrete-time components, and programmable filters to optimize demodulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If frequency separation between actuation and detection is used, then coupling between different channels is reduced, but it does not work for coupling within the same channel and requires complex compensation circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal couplingVSAvoidcompensation circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the coupling path between actuation and detection signals by using separate capacitor sets for each function. Actuation capacitors and detection capacitors are completely separated, preventing the actuation signal from coupling into the detection path, thereby solving the coupling problem without requiring complex compensation circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the capacitor resources into distinct actuation capacitors and detection capacitors, rather than sharing a single capacitor set. This segmentation ensures that actuation and detection signals operate on independent electrical paths, eliminating coupling issues while maintaining system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If actuation signal level is decreased to reduce coupling, then coupling distortion is reduced, but actuation dynamic range is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling distortionVSAvoidactuation dynamic range
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the detection function from the actuation path by using separate detection capacitors that do not share the actuation signal path. This allows the actuation signal to maintain its full dynamic range without being constrained by coupling concerns, as the detection capacitors are electrically isolated from actuation signal variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If manual trimming is used to compensate for mismatches, then detection accuracy is improved, but device complexity and calibration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms through the use of matched capacitor pairs and differential measurement techniques. By using capacitors with closely matched characteristics and implementing differential detection, the system automatically compensates for process variations and mismatches without requiring external trimming or calibration, thereby maintaining high detection accuracy while minimizing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the dynamic range of actuation and detection signals, reduces signal distortion, and achieves accurate phase alignment without significant power or area penalties, improving the overall performance of MEMS inertial sensors in harsh environments.

Implementation Method 1

an excitation signal is needed for detection of capacitance variations in both a sense loop and a drive loop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

actuation capacitors share the same proof mass with the detection capacitors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS8508290B2Interface for MEMS inertial sensors
Publication Date: 2013.08.13 GOODIX TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
  • US8508290B2 patent drawing
  • US8508290B2 patent drawing
  • US8508290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a high-performance interface circuit for micro-electromechanical (MEMS) inertial sensors, an excitation signal (used to detect capacitance variation) is used to control the value of an actuation signal bit stream to allow the dynamic range of both actuation and detection paths to be maximized and to prevent folding of high frequency components of the actuation bit stream due to mixing with the excitation signal. In another aspect, the effects of coupling between actuation signals and detection signals may be overcome by performing a disable/reset of at least one of and preferably both of the detection circuitry and the MEMS detection electrodes during actuation signal transitions. In a still further aspect, to get a demodulated signal to have a low DC component, fine phase adjustment may be achieved by configuring filters within the sense and drive paths to have slightly different center frequencies and hence slightly different delays.