MEMS Sensor Eddy Current Reduction via Closed Loop Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MEMS sensor devices face interference from eddy currents induced by electromagnetic signals, leading to reduced performance and reliability, particularly in close proximity to components like antennas in electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an electrically conductive closed loop structure arranged in proximity to the membrane and regions of differing electrical conductivity within the membrane to reduce eddy currents, with the closed loop structure configured to generate an opposing magnetic field and the conductivity variations disrupting eddy current paths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If MEMS sensor is placed in close proximity to antenna or other electromagnetic signal sources, then miniaturization and integration are achieved, but electromagnetic interference and eddy currents deteriorate sensor performance and reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A closed loop structure is introduced as an intermediary element between the electromagnetic signal source and the MEMS sensor membrane. This loop generates an opposing magnetic field that counteracts the interfering electromagnetic signals, thereby protecting the sensor without requiring physical separation or shielding that would increase device volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The electrical conductivity distribution of the membrane is modified by introducing regions of differing conductivity. This parameter change disrupts the formation of eddy currents in the membrane, reducing their harmful effects while maintaining the membrane's sensing functionality and avoiding increased device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If closed loop structure is added to reduce eddy currents, then electromagnetic interference is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy currentsVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closed loop structure serves multiple functions: it generates an opposing magnetic field to counteract electromagnetic interference, and its presence also influences the eddy current distribution in the membrane. By combining multiple protective functions in a single element, the overall device complexity is minimized while achieving effective interference reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The solution combines two protective mechanisms (opposing magnetic field generation and eddy current path disruption) into a unified structure. The closed loop works synergistically with the differentiated conductivity regions of the membrane, creating a coordinated interference reduction system that avoids the complexity of separate independent protective structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If regions of differing electrical conductivity are introduced in the membrane, then eddy current paths are disrupted, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy current pathsVSAvoidmembrane fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The membrane is designed with localized regions of differing electrical conductivity rather than uniform properties. These localized conductivity variations are strategically positioned to disrupt eddy current paths while maintaining compatibility with standard MEMS fabrication processes, avoiding the need for complex multi-material manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The electrical conductivity parameter of the membrane material is varied in specific regions through doping or material composition changes during fabrication. This parameter modification is achieved using existing semiconductor processing techniques, allowing eddy current disruption without fundamentally changing the manufacturing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively minimizes eddy currents, reducing heat dissipation and pressure fluctuations, thereby enhancing the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio and reliability of MEMS sensor devices.

Implementation Method 1

The closed loop structure is arranged in proximity to the membrane and is configured to reduce eddy currents in the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The membrane comprises regions of differing electrical conductivity configured to reduce eddy currents in the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS10214413B2Micro-electro-mechanical system sensor devices
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US10214413B2 patent drawing
  • US10214413B2 patent drawing
  • US10214413B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A MEMS sensor device includes an electrically conductive membrane and an electrically conductive closed loop structure. The closed loop structure is arranged in proximity to the membrane and is configured to reduce eddy currents in the membrane.