MEMS Sensor Linearization via Frequency-Dependent Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensors, such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, face accuracy issues due to temperature and signal amplitude variations, leading to nonlinear errors that current compensation strategies, including piecewise linear approaches, are insufficient to correct, especially under extreme conditions like high vibrations and temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that associate test temperature values with input signal values to determine temperature-input signal pairs, measure output signals, and calculate compensation terms to modify the sense signal of MEMS sensors, using polynomial formulas to address both linear and nonlinear variations, enabling self-testing and self-calibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fixed or static correction strategies are used to compensate MEMS sensor errors, then the compensation process is simple, but the accuracy is insufficient under high amplitude vibrations and frequency-variant conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor accuracyVSAvoidcompensation methodology complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic compensation by transitioning from fixed correction values to frequency-dependent correction values. The system measures the actual frequency of vibrations and selects appropriate correction values from a lookup table, allowing the compensation to adapt dynamically to changing vibration conditions rather than using a static correction approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter used for compensation from a fixed static value to a frequency-dependent value. By using the measured vibration frequency as a selector parameter for the correction lookup table, the system adjusts the correction magnitude based on the actual operating conditions, thereby improving accuracy without requiring complex real-time calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If polynomial formulas are used to correct nonlinearities, then the accuracy improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenonlinearity correction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computation by pre-calculating correction values for various frequency conditions and storing them in a lookup table during manufacturing or calibration. This eliminates the need for complex polynomial calculations during real-time operation, as the system only needs to perform a simple table lookup based on the measured frequency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mathematical computation (polynomial formulas) with a simpler data retrieval operation (lookup table). By substituting the computational mechanism with a memory-based approach, the system achieves the same nonlinear correction accuracy without the computational burden of real-time polynomial evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If frequency-dependent correction values are implemented, then the accuracy under vibrations improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration accuracyVSAvoidcorrection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the correction approach by creating a lookup table with discrete correction values for different frequency ranges. This segmentation allows the complex frequency-dependent correction to be broken down into manageable discrete steps, simplifying the implementation while maintaining accuracy across varying vibration frequencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively compensates for nonlinear errors in MEMS sensors, improving accuracy by modifying the output signals based on calculated compensation terms, reducing vibration-induced errors and enhancing robustness in applications like automotive systems.

Implementation Method 1

The operation of these forces on the movable proof masses may be measured based on the movement of the proof masses in response to the forces. In some implementations, this movement is measured based on distance between the movable proof masses and sense electrodes, which form capacitors for sensing the movement.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS11619492B2Sensor linearization based upon correction of static and frequency-dependent non-linearities
Publication Date: 2023.04.04 INVENSENSE INC
  • US11619492B2 patent drawing
  • US11619492B2 patent drawing
  • US11619492B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for compensation of a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensor may include associating test temperature values with input test signal values, identifying temperature-input signal pairs, and applying one of the test temperature values and one of the test signal values to the MEMS sensor. Desired output signal values may be determined, with each of the desired output signal values corresponding to one of the applied temperature-input signal pairs. Measured output signal values from the MEMS sensor may be measured, with each of the measured output signal values corresponding to one of the applied temperature-input signal pairs. Compensation terms may be determined based on the plurality of temperature-input signal pairs, the corresponding plurality of measured output signal values, and the corresponding plurality of desired output signal values. Compensation terms may be used to modify a sense signal of the MEMS sensor.