Automated MEMS Sound Transducer Testing Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual testing of MEMS sound transducers is time-consuming, costly, and limits the number of devices that can be tested simultaneously, with challenges in stable and rapid transportation between testing positions and reduced accuracy due to manual calibration and sound-proof issues.

Innovation Solution

An automated testing apparatus and method that includes a testing platform, loading device, testing-signal generating device, sound sensing device, and control unit to categorize MEMS sound transducers into groups based on testing sounds, with a sealing component to prevent air pressure interference and improve sound quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual testing is used, then flexibility and simplicity are maintained, but testing efficiency and productivity are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system is divided into independent functional modules: loading device, testing-signal generating device, sound sensing device, and unloading device. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently controlled, enabling automated high-volume testing while maintaining system manageability through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated devices. The loading device automatically positions MEMS sound transducers, the testing-signal generating device electronically generates test signals, and the sound sensing device automatically detects acoustic responses, eliminating manual intervention and significantly improving testing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If multiple devices are tested simultaneously, then productivity increases, but measurement precision and sound quality may deteriorate due to air pressure interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of devices tested simultaneouslyVSAvoidsound quality accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The testing platform is designed with multiple independent testing positions, each equipped with its own sound sensing device and acoustic environment. This segmentation allows simultaneous testing of multiple devices while maintaining acoustic isolation, preventing air pressure interference between adjacent test positions and preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Acoustic isolation structures and sound-proof chambers serve as intermediaries between adjacent testing positions. These structures prevent air pressure waves and acoustic interference from propagating between neighboring test positions, enabling parallel testing without compromising sound quality accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual calibration of distance is performed, then equipment complexity is reduced, but measurement precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance calibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing system incorporates self-calibration capabilities through pre-configured mechanical positioning features and reference markers. The loading device and testing platform are designed with precise mechanical stops and alignment features that automatically establish correct distances between MEMS sound transducers and microphones, eliminating the need for manual calibration while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual measurement and adjustment operations are replaced with automated electronic positioning systems. The loading device uses programmed motion control to precisely position devices at predetermined distances, and the system can electronically adjust and verify positions, replacing manual calibration with automated electronic control for higher precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If rapid transportation between testing positions is implemented, then productivity increases, but stability and reliability of device positioning may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting speedVSAvoidpositioning stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The loading device is designed to pre-position MEMS sound transducers in a stable initial state before testing begins. Quick-release mechanisms and pre-aligned fixtures are prepared in advance, allowing rapid transfer without compromising positioning accuracy. The system establishes stable mechanical connections before each test and quickly releases them afterward, maintaining reliability during high-speed operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system employs dynamic positioning mechanisms that can rapidly adjust device positions while maintaining stability during testing. The loading device uses controlled motion with acceleration and deceleration phases to minimize vibrations, and the testing platform provides active stabilization to compensate for any positioning variations, enabling both rapid transportation and stable positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances testing efficiency and quality by allowing high-volume, automated testing of MEMS sound transducers with improved accuracy and reduced costs, enabling faster categorization and reduced manual intervention.

Implementation Method 1

a sound sensing device, configured to receive the at least one testing sound

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic detection: Sound

Implementation Method 2

a testing-signal generating device, configured to generate at least one testing signal, wherein the plurality of under-test devices receives the at least one testing signal and produces at least one testing sound according to the at least one testing signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroacoustic conversion:

Data Source

PatentUS11368804B1Testing apparatus and testing method thereof
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 XMEMS LABS INC
  • US11368804B1 patent drawing
  • US11368804B1 patent drawing
  • US11368804B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A testing apparatus including a testing platform, a loading device, a testing-signal generating device, a sound sensing device, a control unit, and an unloading device is disclosed. The loading device is configured to load a plurality of under-test devices to the testing platform. The testing-signal generating device is configured to generate at least one testing signal. The plurality of under-test devices receives the at least one testing signal and produces at least one testing sound-according to the at least one testing signal. The sound sensing device is configured to receive the at least one testing sound. The control unit controls the unloading device to unload the plurality of under-test devices from the testing platform and controls the unloading device to categorize the plurality of under-test devices into a plurality of groups according to the at least one testing sound received by the sound sensing device.