MEMS Spring Design for Adjustable Stiffness
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional serpentine-structured springs in MEMS devices face challenges in achieving desired spring constants due to susceptibility to breakage or sticking during manufacturing and use, primarily due to heat, stress, surface tension, and vibration, which affects the reliability and yield of mirror devices and optical switches.
Innovation Solution
A spring design featuring an elongated member with a pair of ends and multiple bending portions, where the total length of elements parallel to the axis is greater than the gap between the ends in a no-load state, allowing for adjustable spring constants in various directions without compromising the structural integrity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a serpentine-structured spring is used in MEMS mirror devices, then the spring can provide elastic deformation for mirror tilting, but the spring becomes susceptible to breakage or sticking during manufacturing and use due to heat, stress, surface tension, and vibration
Solution Approach 1:
The spring is divided into multiple parallel elements (first, second, third elements) connected through bending portions, creating a segmented structure that distributes mechanical stress across multiple load paths. This segmentation prevents any single element from bearing the full stress load, reducing the risk of breakage under thermal and mechanical stress during manufacturing and operation.
Solution Approach 2:
The spring structure transitions from a conventional single-planar serpentine design to a multi-dimensional configuration with elements extending in different directions (first element in first direction, second element in second direction, third element in third direction). This dimensional diversification allows the spring to accommodate stress from multiple directions simultaneously, reducing susceptibility to sticking and breakage under varied manufacturing and operating conditions.
2Reliability
If the spring structure is made more robust to prevent breakage, then reliability improves, but the ability to achieve desired spring constants for smooth mirror tilting may be compromised
Solution Approach 1:
Different elements of the spring are configured with different orientations and properties (first element in first direction, second element in second direction, third element in third direction). This local differentiation allows each element to contribute differently to the overall spring constant, enabling precise control over the spring's mechanical characteristics while maintaining structural robustness. The bending portions connecting these elements provide localized flexibility that ensures smooth mirror tilting.
Solution Approach 2:
The spring functions as a composite mechanical structure combining multiple elements with different spatial orientations and mechanical properties. This composite configuration allows the spring to simultaneously achieve high reliability through distributed stress paths and the desired spring constants for smooth operation, as each element contributes differently to the overall mechanical response.
3Ease of manufacture
If conventional serpentine springs are used, then the structure is simple to manufacture, but the spring constants in various directions cannot be independently adjusted to optimize performance
Solution Approach 1:
The spring is segmented into multiple independently configurable elements (first, second, third elements) with distinct orientations. This segmentation enables independent adjustment of spring constants in different directions by modifying individual element properties, while the overall segmented structure remains compatible with standard MEMS manufacturing processes, maintaining ease of manufacture.
Solution Approach 2:
The spring structure incorporates elements extending in multiple dimensions (first direction, second direction, third direction), allowing independent control of spring constants along different axes. This multi-dimensional configuration provides design flexibility for optimizing mirror tilting characteristics while maintaining a structure that can be manufactured using conventional MEMS techniques.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This design enables the spring to be formed with desired characteristics, reducing the likelihood of breakage or sticking, thereby improving the reliability and productivity of mirror devices and optical switches by allowing for adjustable spring constants and enhanced durability against mechanical stress.
Implementation Method 1
an elongated member including a pair of ends and made of an elastic material, and a plurality of bending portions which are formed between the pair of ends
Implementation Method 2
voltages are separately applied to the electrodes 940a to 940d through the interconnections 970, so that electric fields formed by the potential differences between the mirror 830 and the electrodes 940a to 940d apply electrostatic attracting forces to the mirror 830
Data Source
AI summary
A total length of members (11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25) formed in an X-axis direction of a spring (1) is larger than a spring length of the spring (1) and larger than a total length of members (12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24) formed in a Y-axis direction. With this arrangement, spring constants of respective axes can be increased, and a spring constant in a direction R can be set appropriately and freely within a wider range.


