MEMS Stabilizer for Deformable Element Roll-Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) with deformable elements suffer from performance degradation and potential device failure due to undesired deformations along unintended directions, which existing technologies fail to adequately address without compromising desired deformation capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A stabilizer is attached to the deformable element to minimize or eliminate undesired deformations while maintaining desired deformation capabilities, by being capable of moving with the deformable element and increasing its roll-stiffness, thereby enhancing the stability of MEMS devices such as micromirror devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a deformable element is used to enable desired deformation, then the device can achieve required motion or actuation, but the deformable element experiences parasitic deformation along undesired directions causing performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation capabilityVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A stabilizer element is introduced as an intermediary component attached to the deformable element. The stabilizer selectively constrains parasitic deformations along undesired directions while permitting desired deformations, thereby mediating between the need for flexibility and the need for stability without directly modifying the deformable element itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If rigid constraints are added to prevent parasitic deformation, then stability improves, but the deformation ability in the desired direction is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation stabilityVSAvoiddeformation ability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer is designed to provide differential constraint characteristics: it applies strong constraining forces in directions where parasitic deformation occurs, while maintaining flexibility or openness in the desired deformation direction. This local differentiation of mechanical properties allows simultaneous achievement of stability and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If multiple stoppers are used to constrain the deformable element, then parasitic deformation is reduced, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation controlVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizer integrates multiple constraint functions into a single unified component rather than using multiple separate stoppers. This merging approach achieves equivalent or superior parasitic deformation control while reducing the total number of components, simplifying the device structure and potentially improving reliability through fewer attachment points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8059323B2Stabilizer for MEMS devices having deformable elements
Publication Date: 2011.11.15 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US8059323B2 patent drawing
  • US8059323B2 patent drawing
  • US8059323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stabilizer mechanism is coupled to a deformable element of a microelectromechanical device for reducing unwanted deformation of the deformable element by increasing the stiffness of the deformable element in selected other directions than the direction along which desired deformation is performed.