MEMS Device Dynamic Stiffness Tuning via Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices face significant performance variations due to fabrication mismatches, process uncertainties, and environmental disturbances, leading to deviations from intended performance specifications, which existing tuning methods and design adjustments have not adequately addressed.

Innovation Solution

A MEMS device with a mechanical subsystem, actuator, sensing capacitor, measurement circuit, and control circuit that applies time-varying control signals to adjust the effective stiffness, damping, and mass, allowing for dynamic tuning and optimization of design parameters to reduce performance variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feedback control is applied to tune microstructures, then performance parameters such as quality factor, linearity, and bandwidth are improved, but device complexity increases due to additional control circuits and sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance consistencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by sensing the actual position of the movable electrode using capacitance measurement and applying corrective voltage through the actuator. The control circuit continuously monitors displacement and adjusts the actuation voltage to compensate for fabrication variations, maintaining consistent performance across different devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary control system that mediates between the actuator and the mechanical structure. The control circuit acts as an intermediary layer that translates desired position commands into actual positions by compensating for manufacturing errors, isolating the mechanical design from performance variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If design parameters are adjusted to account for fabrication variations, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the design process becomes more complex and computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-compensating for expected fabrication errors in the design phase. Design parameters are intentionally adjusted to account for anticipated manufacturing variations, so that the final device performance matches specifications despite dimensional deviations during fabrication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying design parameters such as electrode dimensions, gap distances, and material properties to find optimal values that are robust against fabrication variations. Multiple parameter sets are evaluated to identify combinations that maintain performance consistency across manufacturing tolerances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If Monte Carlo algorithms are used to analyze design uncertainties, then measurement precision of performance variation is improved, but computational cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuncertainty quantification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing uncertainty analysis on only the most critical design parameters rather than all parameters. By identifying and focusing computational resources on parameters with the greatest impact on performance, the analysis achieves sufficient precision without the full computational burden of analyzing every parameter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces sensitivity to process variations and geometry/material properties, achieving desired performance specifications with reduced computational costs and increased precision, enabling precise control of MEMS devices.

Implementation Method 1

a sensing capacitor including a first plate attached to and movable with the driven mass and a second plate substantially fixed in position, wherein a capacitance of the sensing capacitor varies as the driven mass moves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

an actuator responsive to a time-varying control signal to apply force to the driven mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS10024879B2Performance improvement of MEMS devices
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 PURDUE RES FOUND
  • US10024879B2 patent drawing
  • US10024879B2 patent drawing
  • US10024879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) device includes a driven mass and has a natural stiffness or damping. An actuator applies force to the mass, movement of which is measured by a sensing capacitor. A control circuit operates the actuator per displacement or velocity of the driven mass, so that a characteristic stiffness or damping of the mechanical subsystem is different from the respective natural value. A method of transforming a MEMS device design includes determining an aim performance value of the design and a baseline performance uncertainty of the design, selecting candidate sets of parameter values, determining a candidate, first, and second performance value for each, scoring the candidates, and repeating until one of the candidates satisfies a termination criterion, so the transformed design using that candidate set has the aim performance value and the respective first and second performance values closer to each other than the baseline performance uncertainty.